Weird, it's almost as if the feelings of victimhood and being wronged are a universal result of the human experience.

Though Savage's logic is tenuous at best, the difference between "Christians speaking for all Christians" and "Men speaking for all Men" is that Christians choose to become Christians and men don't choose to become men. Christians have self-associated, while a third party has lumped all men into a group.

That's disappointing. I had assumed it was because they diverted resources away from on/off switch and toward making that rubber the cheapest, thinnest bullshit material they could find, so that it would tear in no less than 6 hours of use.

No, it's not "this again." Your headline is about disparity of opinions between black people and white people at large, mitigated by a comment on white NBA fans. Your article is "examining why these two polls [one of NBA fans, one of general people] yielded different results."

That's actually a perfect analogy, because I've never seen an HOA with the right to force the sale of a unit. They can restrict owner privileges, including building—or in extreme cases, maybe even unit? I dunno, not in my building—access, but they can't touch your deed. Similarly, the NBA owners could (probably) vote…

Because the validity of any conclusion is based on the integrity of the underlying data and the reasonableness of the assumptions which support it? If the methodology was "ask one white guy and one black guy their opinion" and the conclusion was "all black people hate Donald Sterling and all white people think Donald…

Sorry, I guess I should have clarified: the questions were awful for supporting the conclusion you've drawn in your headline, that "whites are way more lenient" towards a racist asshole. Your headline is about the differences between white and black respondents, but your article is about the difference in two polls;…

Indeed, I do not.

Yeah, it was indirect.

Of course it's indirect; if it were direct in the box, it would be a penalty kick. Indirect kicks are still free kicks.

You can draw the most racist conclusion you want, Reuben, but you should at least mention how awful both of the sample questions are. A wide range of very reasonable, and very non-lenient opinions* aren't captured because of the awful phrasing of the questions.

How did they get a free kick inside the box? Did the keeper illegally handle a pass or something?

Have you ever played keeper? There's a reason you warm up with coaches throwing the ball, before moving on to blocking kicks. A soccer ball lacks the density of a baseball or basketball; it floats. Ignoring the highly interruptable mechanics of a keeper's throw, with the number of bodies in the box, you would never…

I think the soccer goalie question is that the goalie can use his hands in either team's box, rather than just his own. So if you sent a corner kick into the box, your own goalie could spike the ball, or catch it and dribble it basketball-style at the goal.

If only there was a simple, nonviolent means of resolving this conflict...

Woman who is paid to sleep with disgusting old rich guy is dumb, self-promoting

Hustle board designer lacks hustle.

Since he's an asswad law student, he's also got way less experience than Kessler at shameless self-promotion and media manipulation.

Interesting story: Inspired by last year's tragedy, thousands of people clamored to participate in the Boston Marathon in defiance of looming threats of terrorist attacks.

The fact that you're happy to spend more money to unlock content you already own but are time-barred from accessing SHOULD be an indictment of the Earned Unlock model in multiplayer games, but we all know that Fahey is just a shill for publishers.