Almost all of these are too small. Are you talking about a food truck, or food delivery?

Right near Silverstone?

Agreed - besides, this is standard operating procedure in the government contracting world, and happens every time a contract is awarded. The potential reward for appealing is too great to pass up, relative to the cost.

I mean, the cynic in me is thinking that since such a statement as "yeah, it's not meant to protect a driver in the slightest" has been made - some opportunistic individual will use that to their advantage, hoping for a lawsuit (or posthumous lawsuit to benefit their family, or some such nefarious thing) after an…

Royals Defeat A's, Ned Yost In Epic Play-In Game

I have to agree. In DC, all federal buildings have massive concrete planters (or bollards, in places) in front of them, which are more aesthetically pleasing, already exist, and either could stop this truck - or could be up-scaled to do so.

The ability of a driver to survive such a crash is not a primary concern.

Exactly. This is a serious case of "Jack of all trades is master of none."

Unless he's suddenly earned a Ph.D. in fluid- and aerodynamics, it's quite doubtful that he had any significant impact to the "design" of the car (which, as pointed out, looks mostly stock).

Isn't the key ingredient the hydrogen peroxide? The hair product version just adds things to make it a gel.

Apart from everything else wrong with this scenario - and there are SO MANY, as the comments continue to rack up describing - why would any of this fall under the jurisdiction of DHS?

I don't mean to be a jerk and knock something that is clearly awesome - but a good deal of that (especially the wheels) appear to be not-Lego. Unless I'm wrong. I can't see the pics very clearly at the moment.

Didn't this story, complete with "absurd" quote, break some time ago?

With a massive amount more weight in the front and seemingly no other structural changes - wouldn't one have to expect catastrophic understeer?

Is this not a curious definition of "made?"

The thing is, Montezemolo's approach was the right one. And the proof has been in the pudding.

My favorite will continue to be the 78 Stingray. Pure sex.

9.) Give Good Visual Cues

Those recalls were issued by manufacturers after their actuarial scientists determined the recall cost was less than that of damages.