Koenigseggs have much more torque than either car and use dual clutches. It can be done, and the Z06 is going to be expensive anyway. There is no excuse.

For everyone that is still defending an automatic Corvette, tell me this: why do they still not offer one with a dual clutch gearbox? You can get one on a Dart, and for the same price as a normal auto I might add. There is simply no excuse. That goes for any other high-end sports car out there that might still come…

There's actually really no excuse for them to STILL not offer a dual-clutch. You can get a dual clutch on a freaking Dart. GM still sucks and deserves the hate.

It just wasn't theft. The car was in the dealer's possession by consent and the dealer destroyed it. It doesn't matter that the couple didn't consent to the joy ride specifically.

All those words yet no answer to my question. That's because, deep down, you can't justify forcing the dealer to eat the depreciation. It would be a good thing for them to do, but there is no legal, moral, or ethical obligation for them to do so.

The only competition that came close at Le Mans was Aston Martin. Bring it.

Why should the dealership eat the depreciation on the car? If this was a 2004 one-owner Civic with 50,000 miles, no one would be demanding the dealer eat 5 figures and give the customer a new Civic. A showroom stock Camaro that new IS just another used car. They're not that special or particularly limited, even in…

So hateful. If someone drives through my house, then I am owed the cash and compensation for everything you listed. If someone destroys my car, I trust myself over some jerk off salesman to find a replacement. Yeah, it's a hassle, but the dealer has already proven that it's not able to find the right replacement,…

Everyone involved. Including you and me :P

It costs the dealer less to offer them an equal value car, because the dealer pays thousands (many thousands if they are offering $5k in "feel good" money) under market price for the car. And there'd be nothing wrong with that if they could actually find a comparable example that the couple would be happy with. …

The dealership doesn't owe them a new car. The dealership (or its insurance company) owes them what the old car was worth when they handed it over. The couple needs to just demand that and forget a replacement car that will minimize the dealer's cost anyway.

I was in the same boat with my Boxster. a month after graduating college, 3 weeks into a new job, and no student loans or past credit cards to give any history whatsoever made it the wrong time to finance a car. But I found the right one, and perhaps due to a large down payment USAA approved me for 5 years at 13%. …

I know that it's beating a dead horse at this point, but I'd be lying through my teeth if I told you I didn't think that first picture was of an Evo X.

I said legitimate GT-Rs. Legit in the sense that they are US legal and stock. We know for a fact that supply of those has gone up- it was 0 before Wednesday (ones imported legally disguised as something else may be under the fed's radar but are still illegitimate and subject to seizure if they figure out what's going…

Are more people suddenly going to want a 25 year old car? You have those that held off due to the rule vs. the increased supply of legitimate cars. I suppose those that held off could outnumber the increased supply while there's only one or two or model years available, but I can't imagine these will be worth as…

Odd, the team principal (forget his name) and owner said last year that they wanted to stick with race motors and wouldn't bother with the USCC P class. I figured he would jump to the WEC.

Fantastic stuff, I'm glad it went so smoothly! $15-20k seems like a deal now, but I wonder if the price will go down as it gets easier to get these cars over here. Cobb's given me hope of achieving a (very foolhardy) dream of mine though- importing one of these bad boys come 2030:

"I believe in tolerance and equality as long as you agree with me."

They can't sell superhero minifigs by themselves as minifigs due to licensing. That would be considered an action figure, and whoever does Batman action figures must have an exclusive license.

Not necessarily. That is probably a rule and the rule itself is an oversight. Whoever responded to all this just responded from a technical perspective (the rule is a rule and we can't yet say we're going to change because that takes meetings and important people making decisions, and that can take longer than 24…