He should make the homeless fight over McDonalds then force the winner to suck his wiener like normal rich Right Wing people do to honor Jesus.

Well done. How very original, edgy, and pushing the boundaries. Anti-Semitic ‘jokes’, so fresh.

I think you have completely missed the point of the feminist movement.

Male here, full disclosure, isn’t that the entire point? That if they STILL WANT to show off their bodies (just quoting you, those caps aren’t meant to be aggressive) then they should be able to do so free of any consequences, disapproving statements (such as yours), or the expectation that that is what they should…

Even better would be to play co-op with your friends without any of you having played the level. The explanation the developer gave is just retarded - and game mechanic-wise it makes little sense.

The game was gold. Like an entire month before the last chance trial, which means it should be a generally accurate representation of what to expect. The coop worked like that previously. Without clear explanation from the devs, the main conclusion anyone would come to is that’s how the system would work in the final…

If I had bought this and convinced my friends to buy this, I’d be pissed. Luckily for myself, I skipped this one planning to buy it later. I guess I just won’t buy it at all now. It’s always annoying when devs of “hard” games want to tell me how to play their game. They go through all the work of adding co-op them…

Yeah, I don’t really see the logic of that, either.

There will be a tiny subset of the game’s player base who beat it without any help. And those people will largely be the kinds of people who are very skilled at these kinds of games, and weren’t going to use co-op anyway. And then those people can help someone else, and those people who received help can turn around…

Okay, well from now on I will play every single player game with co-op by myself. Because obviously by using the little gaming time I have by playing things I enjoy with my friends, I’m ruining the game for myself because I’m not playing it specifically how the devs want me too. I’m so sorry.

Yep. It’s lazy and tired. No thought was given to this decision. Clearly, because it seems to be an 11th hour change. It only increases frustration for those of us who choose to coop.

This makes zero sense. How is being carried by someone who is overlevelled and already beaten the level harder than playing with someone who is just as weak as you are? All they are doing is removing advertised options from the customer. And doing this actually makes co-op easier, not harder. So it doesn’t even…

Nioh was such game in the last chance demo. There was no host, both players cleared their level at the same time, and you’d co-op from menu to boss, basically playing the whole level.

Actually it makes no sense. It defeats the purpose of the game being hard, if the only way to co-op is if one of you already beat that mission, and is probably over-leveled and over equipped. It just makes the game piss easy for the carried.

I prefer the “this decision makes no gd sense” argument, myself.

Yeah, that’s my beef with the decision. Basically, all you do is wait for your friend to beat it then make them replay it with you or you are that friend and have to replay it with your friend just to get the co-op experience that the game offers. It’s a janky “solution” to a non-problem. I have a friend that I would…

but we were allowed to play that way for 3 pre-release versions of the game with no notice it would be changed...

summoning someone who has already beaten the mission is somehow the more difficult way to play?

Let’s be logical.