jd85
jd85
jd85

He not only hit Vettel, but he also completely ruined his race and his teammate’s too. So he ruined himself, his teammate and ex-Red Bull driver in that race.

What's the point? Like Kvyat can't crash into people driving a Toro Rosso?

He took at a Red Bull alumni in a very very very shitty way at the damned start of the race. They want the new drivers to BEAT the old drivers not crash them out.

I’m with you on this one, it may abide by the rules of the challenge as they are set, but one command/input/attack/two-step is certainly not the same as one hit in this case. As stupid as it may be to get technical over something like this, it’s blatantly obvious that something like this isn’t one hit, so why not just

I agree with spikespeigel. It may be one “command” or one “attack” or one “skill” or “just how that weapon works”, but it’s still entirely 2 hits. 2 separate ticks of damage, and thus not “one hit”. It would be different if the boss itself can’t be one-shotted due to some mechanic, but as far as I know (as a non-Souls

Doesn’t the pontiff’s life bar drop twice? Or is that just a glitch in the gif?

And that includes the most dominant and telling 3-1 win at City in February when we were all waiting for the Foxes to wilt. Mahrez said yesterday that’s when they looked at each other and finally said “we can do this.”

Come on dude. The best teams get the best results. Period. I feel like you’d be totally comfortable writing ‘The Best Team in Europe Will Not Win the Champions League” (in reference to your club Barcelona), which is just crap and wrong.

Spurs have been running up those stats against weak teams. Against Man U, Man City, Arsenal and Leicester in the league, they have two wins, three losses and three draws. Among the same teams, Leicester has three wins, one loss and three draws (with one to play).

Did you apply Michael Caley’s expected goals difference formula to these games to determine a worthy winner?

“Their goalkeeper is great” - here is how it would sound better: “Their goalkeeper is great except in must-win games when you can’t count on him because he will make awful mistakes”

This is what came to my mind when I read the headline too

their goalkeeper is great

One loss in the past 16 games or so-Can’t call ALL of that pure luck

Counterpoint:

So Leicester leads wire to wire, plays beautiful soccer the entire time, post several impressive performances along the way, win the league easily without even much drama down the stretch, and they’re STILL “lucky?”

This is ridiculous. If Tott was the best time in England then they would clearly be at the top. If there is one thing that has held true throughout all my years of watching football is that the table doesn’t lie. You can’t possibly claim that Leicester have been lucky for the ENTIRE season. Some luck has to do with it

Terrible article. I can’t believe that even after Matchweek 35, people aren’t giving Leicester respect. The best team in England will win the Premier League. Leicester is the best team. They are seven points clear of the second best team, its as simple as that. Yes, Tottenham were excellent, but no team has been more

I’m no accident expert, but aren’t cars designed nowadays to crumple in the front as that FIAT did? If the car isn’t crumpling, then the drivers and passengers are absorbing the energy from the impact. Looks like the front of the FIAT just slid under the Volvo, hence why the Volvo’s bumper is fine. The seating

“Can you paint with all the colors of the wind?”