That's too bad. He was only two more sessions away from completing his complimentary tattoo.
That's too bad. He was only two more sessions away from completing his complimentary tattoo.
No, no. The writer must bow down to the whims of everyone else—people without a fraction of the skill or imagination a good writer has—because, feelings. All art must be beholden to social justice agendas.
Oh please, stop it with bullshit euphemisms like "he should aspire to do better". If you really thought it's a writers's prerogative to put only what he/she wants in his/her books, you wouldn't be saying that they should "aspire to do better". At least be fucking honest and say that you DON'T think that writers should…
Ah, I see the problem. You seem to think the joke was at the expense of rape victims, indicating you have incredibly poor reading comprehension and possibly a recent head injury.
There is something very ugly and disgusting about continuing the tradition of shaming men for showing emotion, which is barely concealed under "male tears" comments. It's interesting to see what people use to attack men. "Haha men aren't supposed to cry haha you are a man who voiced your suffering haha". It's one…
You totes won that argument with those hypothetical men!
The newest Jezebel EIC is another white woman.
When asked about his opinion on Hamas, Emmitt Smith replied that it's too garlicky.
I'm not sure that all the cries of "victim blaming!" are on point here... this isn't quite like rape culture, where the perpetrators of rape are regularly protected, defended or even endorsed whereas the victim is shamed and silenced; thus allowing the violence against women to continue unchecked.
Sigh, whatever. I'm not going to bother engaging with you. I've read plenty of your other posts. You're either a bitter, nasty ideologue with tunnel vision—one of the few feminists to whom the stereotypical slur "man-hater" could be justifiably applied—or you're just a troll stirring the pot. Either way you're not…
Sigh... the Jezabel commentors urge to label anyone with a different opinion a 'troll' is almost comical now. I am not just concerned about men, I am concerned about women. I am concerned about everyone equally, you know like feminists tell everyone they are.
"Jezebel is, rightfully, a counterpoint to lack of feminine perspective elsewhere."
And the other half aren't stupids jokes right?
I agree. Reading this article, until the very end I could picture the author shaking her head and chuckling, like "What? Girl, you're pretty loopy LOL." Then at the end there was a brief lecture on communicating with one's SO over sexual dissatisfaction, and no mention of how horrific this act was until the very last…
At this point, crushing the Vikings is about as hard as tripping a one-legged man.
If I can interject my totally-not-asked-for male opinion, I find Piper much worse than Larry. I've thought Biggs was a mouthbreather since American Pie, but in terms of OITNB, Piper is the absolute worst.
No, it's not. Refusing to serve gays is discriminating against gay men and lesbians because you have a personal viewpoint.
"The policy appears to mandate that men who want to reserve tables can do it sight unseen, but that tables of women must include group photos."
According to the email, the men are paying for the table. The women are wanting it comped.
Wait does that read that a table of men is 4k minimum and that a table of women is comped? I think the photo policy is ULTRA gross (as is the accompanying "hot bitches' only policy) but I think that kind of evens it out a little as far as the requirements between the sexes.