Maybe not revenge so much as instant karma, but anyways:

If you all go to the UES there’s a pristinely dumpy Subaru DL always parked right by the Guggenheim for some reason.

“I would honestly just lock down extended magazines as that is arguably what makes civilian variants/ lookalikes of assault rifles more dangerous than other semi-auto rifles. I assume that would be able to get the most traction and be unlikely to get tossed on constitutional grounds.”

Just curious, but how would you better classify the weapons such as the AR-15 when trying enact change on their availability? Maybe more broadly, what would you recommend changing essentially “big-picture” to address mass shootings from a legal perspective?