jayromeobravo
JRDIII
jayromeobravo

So, an article that mentions Kellyanne Conway appears on the leftist-feminist web site Jezebel and what does the very first comment say? Yep, it’s an attack on her personal appearance. Really? Do you people not even see what you are doing here? Every woman above who gleefully agreed with and piled onto this stupid

You people are the biggest fucking hypocrites. You deserve the perpetual misery you make for yourselves.

Thank you for this analysis. You were getting warm, but you tripped when you dismissed the need for ideological diversity as misguided. Ideological diversity is where the media have fallen short and is really what you are suggesting they improve. I believe that ideological diversity will come, to some extent, if news

The world might actually be a better place if all of you SJWs who get so worked up about team mascots being racist decided to channel your energy toward something productive. Your opinions are plain and simply misguided, and the faction you represent includes the only people in the world who fail to recognize that

Thank you for your coverage of this case. You did an excellent job. By reading your very factual and unbiased daily recaps, it became clearer and clearer which way this dispute would be resolved, and that was confirmed today by the jury. A lesser or more biased reporter may have left readers with a foggy, or even

As astounding as it was that he brought in Jimenez, the even more astounding part was that he left him in there even after giving up hits to the first two batters he faced. Even if you can justify bringing in Jimenez it has to be with the caveat that, OK, we’ll let him pitch and see how he does, but at the very first

You are aware, I hope, that the show is based on a 1973 film starring Yul Brenner? I think it even had a sequel. Kind of odd that you wouldn’t mention that fact in your review, but, whatever.

Excellent article, and thank you for hopefully helping to maximize our viewing pleasure by calling attention to the scourge of oversized tickers – seriously. Changing the subject a bit, can I talk you into also doing an analysis of the topic you opened the article with – the size of the score/info boxes on respective

It doesn’t seem right because the rule was put in place to penalize the kicking team for kicking the ball out of bounds, and at no point does the ball actually go out of bounds. So a play like this tends to conflict with our internal sense of fairness, even though Ty Montgomery effectively made the ball out of bounds

A lot of commenters below suggest that this is a sly maneuvering to get around Univision’s edict to remove the posts, but I’m wondering if that’s in fact completely accurate. A couple of questions and comments: