Was it Twain who said that history doesn’t repeat itself, but it does rhyme? That’s apt.

Well said.

No it does not. Here’s just *one* link for you: https://www.nycourts.gov/courts/6jd/bro…

Check the thread, eh? OUTFOXEM has made no predictions, nor has espoused paranoia (although there may be daylight between the definitions you both would affix to that term).

They have. I’ve known it happen in a few cases I was personally close to. Frightening, what a motivated and reasonably bright attorney can do with “random” information, it is.

So noted. I haven't figured out block quotes yet, as infrequently as I post, but I will now check them out and use them appropriately.

Very well stated.

Nah. Been working with 'puters for pay for quite some few decades now; I know what I'm talking about. No interest in impressing anybody here: this is neither a job posting site nor a technical forum where dominance or respect matter; furthermore I don't have a particularly strong Urge to Always be Right. I'm always…

Way to insult and deem irrelevant the concerns (however misguided or irrational or incorrect they seem to you) of a, y'know, actual user.

So it was banned because of "blahblahblah", and not the "ethics/health/" part of what he actually said? Not taking sides here, but you're not the first person in this thread to ignore the clear (clear, at least to, I would posit, an even casually-careful reader) actual argument he was making about "stuff being banned…

Let's hope so! I hadn't heard about it until this morning either, but as Mike hadn't brought it up in his OP I thought it wouldn't hurt to alert the readership, as it were. Happy stuff'n'seasons to you and yours, and to all who eyeball this bit o'digital ink!

You do understand that they were actually hacked (see http://www.dailydot.com/politics/anony… for a list of affected sites)? Or the Lizard Squad made up 13,000 account details and posted the document online (doubtful)?

This is such an "other comic book guy" response, but http://marvel.wikia.com/Pietro_Maximof… begs to differ about Pietro's speed.

It absolutely is not wrong. There is not a single element of incorrectness to the statement. Not a one. It is entirely, completely, accurate, correct, and right. You have yet to provide any way in which it is wrong - because you cannot, as it happens. I confess I do not understand how you would categorize wholly…

If you have 7,000 senses, it is not wrong to say "you have five senses." Because you do have five senses. You actually have 6,995 more, but you most certainly do have five. It is a 100% accurate, true, and "right" (albeit far from comprehensive) statement.

You...um...meant P4 characters only, hence no Mitsuru, right? Seeing as how Mitsuru is a P3 chara?

Nope. It was a Thing that Let the Filmmakers Have a Hand to Hand Combat Scene for the Denouement; nothing more, to me at least. And after the fact, it was a "safe" accessory for Ripley that wouldn't have half of the sensitives in the nation screaming for retribution, which they would have likely done if they'd…

I never went out number-gathering, so I had no idea.

Well said. The whole idea of Clara being freaked out by the new Doctor bugged the hell out of me as well, for the reasons you note. I wouldn't characterize it as the show using a character to talk down to people who might dislike Capaldi, though, as that completely ignores the "not a boyfriend" theme, which seems…

(S)he didn't. You made up that bit about watching a simpler show because of a lesser intelligence. Pro tip: "straightforward" does not mean "simpler," and noting about other options that "there's plenty...out there" does not mean "you are less intelligent for not watching this particular show."