If it’s within the rules, it’s not dishonorable at all. That’s competition. “Honor” in competition is treating your opponent with respect and giving it your best effort. Holding back on a legal technique with no guarantee that others will do the same is stupid, not honorable.

Take THAT, all you jerks that insultingly call these types of games “walking simulators”! This one is a STANDING simulator. So, suck it.

Careful, logical and reasoned discussion is a slippery slope in certain parts of the net. Coming in with facts paints a big red target on your back.

He gave them the $30 they asked for for the system. That’s how it works.

Did he donate any of the money from the eBay sale to the Disabled Veteran’s Thrift Store?

He donated $30 to the Disabled Veteran’s Thrift Store. When he bought it from them. Because they got it for nothing in the first place.

Why would he?

This reminds me of the Onion video of the “Sony Piece of Shit That Doesn’t Fucking Work”, particularly the ads that just say “What the fuck is this?”

Excuse me.

Isn’t this an inherently racist comment?

We were meant to be going after the son?

My mom would be like “Oh that source code I told you to put away, I threw it out”. :(

“It’s just hard to believe the dog was nasty when she took Lamby to every green room with her when Girls was still a thing 4 years ago.”

What, you don’t like handjobs?

Got’em!!

Godammit.... Fine! I’ll buy your stupid book!

Assuming they are paid hourly and this isn’t in some way more physically/mentally/emotionally stressful than their usual tasks, can someone explain how this is unfair to the workers themselves?

Great video. Tremendous sax appeal.

While expressing support for Brevik’s terror act is absolutely terrible, Europe’s restrictions on free speech are disgusting.

What's with the longing for wanting to see people like yourself in film? I have no desire whatsoever to see "myself" or depictions thereof onscreen. At all.