Did anyone else notice how Dierdorf said multiple times that Blount was making fantasy owners very happy? Did his production team not whisper in his ear after the first time, "Hey, cut it with the fantasy shit, you don't know what you're talking about"? Or did he just not give a fuck? You know, don't answer that.

Discarded New York Post headline: Luck beat Tom Brady tonight

Yup, this. I couldn't believe he didn't step out of bounds either, until I realized he was on the field, not watching the game on television with a view of the clock like I was. It's tough to fault the guy for failing to count backward in his head while running his route.

These sorts of things always end in disaster. The last time this many Colombians were purged from a list, it started the War on Drugs.

There's also this undercurrent that if the seahawks lose, then it can only be because the refs (and by extension the NFL and Goodell) hosed them over on purpose.

It's always in the back of your mind that somehow I'm not watching the best at what they do

Don't forget "Elvis has left the building," although he certainly didn't make that up.

Agreed. I would also like to be able to narrow the scope to see who led the league in poise for Innings 1 through 10, Game 7 of the 1991 World Series.

That is funny, Shaughnessy calling out LeBetard for not being a stand-up guy. This coming from a dude who made his entire fucking career by trolling his own team's fan base with shit about the Curse, and since then has desperately inserted himself into any story he covers.

I was also disappointed to see how many asshole moralizers there are in the DS voting. Clemens and Bonds cannot even garner 75% among this group?

This was open to anyone, regardless of whether they regularly read Deadspin or not, correct? So why are you painting all Deadspin readers with the same broad brush? Murray Fucking Chass probably logged on to cast his vote, just because he is an annoying douche-hole.

There might be momentum in the media, but the first objective of any team is to win your division, and when you win your division, you should have a home game.

Ha! Good one.

Depends on the researcher. A decent scientist will write and administer the survey for its target audience to get the most accurate information possible. The study to which he referred may have been in the Journal of the American Medical Association, which is very highly regarded, in which case I'd be more inclined to…

The limit of two drinks per day for men (one for women) appears to be supported by the USDA:

Principal?

You know, it occurs to me that this joke has probably been made about 1000 times on this site. Apologies.

"If that guy doesn't have to change his name, then neither do the Redskins."

I think he seriously based his Super Bowl picks on the proposed alternate playoff bracket of his colleague at the WWL, TMQ:

She kind of Jerry-rigged herself some leverage there off the guys in the row in front of her.