nope. size is about right...
JawzX2, Boost Addict. 1.6t, 2.7tt, 4.2t
jawzx2
Alien Marshmallow Mode Engaged!
You’ll always have Oppo (I hope...) As the FP drifts dangerously close to Youtube comment level...
I literally have ONE choice for Internet service in my area. One. My only boycott option is to discontinue service, and if all my neighbors did the same they’d loose about 100 thousand dollars a year, which they could pretty much entirely recoup by letting go the single tech for our area and discontinuing line…
The Dreamcast was a brilliantly wierd console... It was all the promise of the early internet, the nascent internet of things, and the multi-functional accessory do-dad coupled with equal parts corporate greed, fantastical creative freedom and artistic optimism... but it only lived in the space it created for itself…
Impossible request is impossible.
yup... I took my (lightly modded) Alfa 164-S up to 158 on a public road... in day light and light traffic... Long story, but it involved racing a Mercedes... I don’t condone it, and it was terrifying. Almost as terrifying was slowing down... The Alfa’s aerodynamics were well designed to ram air through the radiator at…
my mom actually taught me to drive on our ‘89 Audio 100 quattro, but the first thing I got to drive on my own was my Dad’s 1986 Mazda B2000 extra cab (2wd)
On paper. In real life the Alfa is faster, smoother torque delivery, better transmission and gear ratios, also higher top speed by a sizable margin. The Alfa Busso V6s typically put out the rated HP at the WHEELS, the Saab is crank HP. I have driven both, and will bet on a stock 164-S/QV in a drag race against a…
yeah, people would always ask me “oh, you drive an Alfa Romeo, hahaha, hows the reliability” and I would have to answer honestly and tell them “pretty good.” And it was. Mine never left me stranded. rear-subframe rust is what ultimately did it in.
Now playing
have you HEARD a Busso v6?
this is FAR faster than the Saab.
Actually the 164 is NOT a fragile car, it somewhat over-built as a mater of fact. the electrics are a nightmare if they start to get fritzy, but mechanically they are quite sturdy and well sorted. My 1992 164-S had somewhat over 400K miles on it when we parted ways. the big one is the timing belt. change the timing…
actually the 164 is NOT a fragile car, it somewhat over-built as a mater of fact. the electrics are a nightmare if they start to get fritzy, but mechanically they are quite sturdy and well sorted. My 1992 164-S had somewhat over 400K miles on it when we parted ways.
My ‘92 164 had slightly over 400K miles on it when we parted ways. The mechanical bits of the 164 are actually quite robust, change the timing belt regularly, don’t let the water pump fail, replace the lower A-arm bushings on a far-too-frequent basis and unless the electrics blow up the late generation Busso V-6s are…
I never wanted a 911. I even drove an older one and was like “meh, I guess that’s cool, I can understand why people like these, just not for me” and then I saw what Singer was doing to them, and I realized how wrong I had been and desperately need one now.
well holy crap! welcome the Univision-(Former Gawker)-verse!
If I remember correctly Buell was the *ONLY* profitable division of HD at the time of it’s dissolution. Fucking Harley killed the best thing they had going. low sales volume or not, it was a successful brand.
I am still fucking bitter.