Have faith. Money will be spent to correct the problem when the problem begins to threaten the wealth of people who have it.
Have faith. Money will be spent to correct the problem when the problem begins to threaten the wealth of people who have it.
But it can be stopped with active remediation.
Indeed. I missed that. The rest remains, however.
I thought Democrats were not in favor of letting landlords pull this kind of shit on their tenants. Also, contracts.
No need to register this with the FAA?
You win one internet. That’s excellent!
“Powerlinen” adapters. You are taking this IoT thing way too far.
“Powerlinen” adapters. You are taking this IoT thing way too far.
I would say, “withdrawal of consent” that led to lack of consent, at least in the first case. The details as reported seem to have clarified since I last read about it. Both events, if they occurred as alleged, would constitute sexual assault in my book if they could be proven. It seems like proof would be difficult…
Possibly. It’s been a while since I read about it. Presently it appears as if the accusation are a little worse than I remember and, if they were true, I would consider them sexual assault. However, it remains quite a bit of he-said/she-said. Since these are verbal contracts and the act generally occurs without…
Gaaah. That sickening sound as the idiot clearly tries to put it into park instead of pulling the handbrake.
Yeah, but his sexual assault charges (as I understand them) are, in fact, rubbish to any normal thinking person or, at least, me. Apparently in Sweden you can retract consent after the act is complete. Morning after regret is, in fact, cause for a charge of sexual assault, there.
If not a, “thank you,” at least an acknowledgement. It is the people who ignore that anything at all was done and act as if you weren’t there that irk me and provoke a muttered, sarcastic, “you’re welcome.”
What did “Western” have to do with it. I was saying “spiritual”. All there is there is the desolate top of a mountain. No structures and no historical events and just a vague claim of “spirits”. We move cemeteries all the time for similar reasons.
“The sunken PBY plane is a very important reminder of the “Day of Infamy,’ just like the USS Arizona” Um, no. Not even remotely so to any feeling human being. The USS Arizona is the resting place of roughly 1500 people. They don’t even know if there was anyone on this airplane. The Arizona and its memorial are the…
If they are making use of it, perhaps. But why is spiritual significance accepted as valid use?
OK, then why is it that spirituality is an acceptable basis for declaring a place to be historically preserved?
But why is spirituality accepted as an objection in the first place?
England is humid.
“As investors, rather than creditors, they’ll be right at the bottom of the list for getting their money back...” Kickstarter funders are NOT INVESTORS. Clearly, this must be repeated over and over again.
The reason why that argument has validity is because of Shannon’s theory of information entropy. It is proper counter-evidence to random processes creating DNA over the time-domain of the universe that must be explored and explained. It isn’t intelligent design that is a problem as a theory, but the way asshats, er,…