It might be awful, but that's exactly why I love it.
It might be awful, but that's exactly why I love it.
We had an '89 Civic Wagovan when I was a kid. You could get a right-side rearview mirror as a dealer-installed option.
hey, that's my old car! Same color too. 1300cc manual. Forget the side mirror - it didn't have a rear defroster either (of course, it was so small I could just lean back and wipe the window clean, but that's not the point :)
My father's 1995 Saturn SL1 did not have a passenger-side rearview. (I don't think there was any optional equipment on that car.)
My '96 Tercel also doesn't have one. I understand it's a base model, but how much would it have cost them to slap one on there and improve visibility by at least 50%? Maybe $30?.
Every cheap Toyta, Honda, or Subaru my dad had from the 70's, 80's, and 90's didn't have a passenger side mirror and the driver side one had to be manually adjusted from the outside. I think this was just a universal econo-car standard at the time...
Bull. Nobody is pulling anything out of their asses by saying that literally everything we've seen thus far indicates that they were going damn fast.