It's because the A-10 supports members of other branched (Army, Marine) so they don't see the direct real benefit of a successful sortie like they do when they take out a HVT. That is what I would say if I were a cynic.

Yes, there are things it cannot do and those are not the missions it is sent on. However, it does things that nothing else we have does (which is why we send it out). They are simply saying, don't take a tool we need for certain jobs without replacing it with the same type of tool. Screw drivers are terrible at…

Operators disagree with you. Danger close CAS missions have a crazy RA with any traditional jet. They avoid those missions unless vitally needed for active defense of friendly forces. Colonels have a shit fit if you suggest using them in that manner.

Nor can they absorb much small arms fire and damage while remaining effective.

Last time I banged in pit row, I got a damn STP. It still burns.

I don't know if you have ever had the pleasure of dealing with civil court, but (like family court) each case really rests on its own merit and has little to do with written law and stare decisis (compared to criminal court, at least)

Now I know why they didn't do a turbo six as the midrange engine on the new mustangs. Cannibalize sales.

Ex-Wives? I agree.

You certainly can, especially if you can show dependence, look at tax status, is she still on their medical coverage, car insurance, living at home. Receiving a significant amount of money from them. 18 is not some sort of magic cut-off. Dependence and guardianship is based on real world factors specific to the person.

That's where you are wrong. There is almost every safe use for this, except one (the one she was using). Every other instance would be generally considered safe by a rational person. Snapchat on a plane, train, riding as a passenger in a car, running off road, on a ride at an amusement park. Everywhere, except when…

She is probably on her parents' insurance which can provide a link as well as the fact that she was driving her dad's car. These can set up a claim that the parents were negligent in facilitating her reckless driving. It is the same logic they are applying to the app, which the difference being a commerce item/service…

Sweet mustang! Is that a Roush or something? I don't recognize the body kit.

Do you know the meaning of that phrase is that he would be falsely protesting. So, your accusation is that he really does not like Tesla's system and is overcompensating in hiding the fact by adamantly defending it. #TheMoreYouKnow

Sounds like a paradigm shift is on the horizon

Don't forget how hot that trunk gets. I wouldn't store any discs or food back there. 140*F

<Culture Clash><Culture Clash>

Sorry, the first rule of Fightcorp. prevents him and me from talking about all that.

I agree

Nice try, but girls aren't good at computers.

It sucks because I like having my car clean and in a lot so other enthusiasts can enjoy it, too. However, this kind of behavior makes me think I need to put a cover on it if i'm going to be somewhere for a while (especially, in a garage since the privacy seems to foster this type of behavior).