janvan1672
Jan Van Der Heyden
janvan1672

wrong

Well that’s a shame.

This is easily the best photograph I’ve ever seen. The lighting is impossibly perfect and makes these two seem angelic which isn’t far from the truth. The way they casually hold each other is proof that true love exists. You can see it in their genuine, relaxed smiles. This is the purest expression of happiness and

I’m having a hard time figuring out what’s so confusing about that. Jeb was not high energy, Biden is super high energy. In all other ways they are the same. It wouldn’t be unreasonable for the DNC to select Jeb to run for them. He’s a classic DNC guy, same flavor as Hilldawg minus the masculinity.

I guess I shouldn’t say I’m concerned because he and Trump are basically the same candidate. If they’re the two nominees I feel like I win either way. So I probably won’t vote.

California has a massive population and a large economy. This is not due to California state policy. It’s in spite of California state policy.

I’ll be kind of honest with you. As a Trump supporter, Biden scares the daylights out of me. He’s got the experience, the credibility, the Obama friendship bracelet or whatever. He’s got it all. He’s a union guy and that plays well in the battleground states that Dems need to flip. He talks fast which proves he is

Without California the country would be strapped for cash

Fully aware.

We should either conquer or buy Greenland, but we should definitely swap populations.

California has some uniquely beautiful areas, but the price of admission - 13% state income tax, extremely high cost of living thanks to the socialist elite that live in gated communities (with private security), rampant aggressive homelessness complete with shameless public defecation in the cities, millions of

Obvious lie, otherwise I’d like to meet you for lunch. 

Taxes are used to provide services.

Ben’s entire purpose is to hammer hot social topics from the right in order to herd conservatives back to neocon interventionism. It’s not working.

Gorgeous

You aren’t making a point. I clarified the point you were trying to make and now... this. Get a hold of yourself. 

Really? Because if Hillary was president we’d at the very least still be in Syria and in a much tenser spot with Russia. We’d be focusing on what we should be doing in other parts of the world, for other parts of the world rather than focusing on domestic issues. 

It’ll be Warren. She’s already seen as a wonky academic and that alone carries weight with the people who just want to feel smart for voting for the “smart” candidate and not dumb old Drumpf. She panders to Bernie’s crowd and can easily make herself into a Hillary Lite as well. She’s the obvious choice to try to fuse

She has no chance - she’s not even remotely likable - but let’s pretend she does. Her first act as president is to immediately sell whatever she can for her own benefit after she leaves office. More war, more giveaways to corporations and other elite entities she hopes to gain favor with, both domestically and

The left and right exist. They’re just benchmarks for political ideology. I think you’re trying to say that the Democrats and Republicans do not represent those benchmarks as many think they do. Agree. Neocons infect both sides and have captured the centrists. They’re slowly waking up though which is why most of them