Yes, this exactly. Sorry I didn’t see it in the grays before I made my comment because I think you put it much better.

Like, I sincerely believe she is trying to be a nice person who wants to be good, but what with the extreme wealth disparities and 24/7 social media access, that forces anyone with that platform who’s trying to engage with users as a real person and also as a product is going to end up in a very bad place.

Yup. I’ve nervously refreshed a few of these Jez articles about her lately expecting to see lots of comments like “but she’s nice - why are you all so mean?”

I don’t think she’s a terrible human being at all. But she’s trying to be all things in a way she simply cannot be; a person trying to be the living embodiment of…

This. She means well, she just has kind of an obnoxious personality (and a massive thirst for attention, but that’s pretty much a given in that world).

You can’t be down-to-earth and also whine about how hard it is to be rich.

I find her very pandering in an insincere way to the middle brow audience. She is extraordinarily loaded and has an elite bubble. It’s all trying too hard, I find it transparent.  Maybe I’m wrong b/c I never really followed her schtick .

I think Chrissy Teigen made the right choice in abandoning Twitter. She was trying to position herself as a “benevolent” Kardashian and that paradox was starting to damage her brand. You can’t be down-to-earth and also whine about how hard it is to be rich. That whole family leans into being vapid and it seems as if…

Im gonna get ROASTED for this but I gotta get this off my chest:

The dedication to announcing leaving twitter and emphasizing why, it's a bit insufferable but hey, whatever helps you manage is great. 

Ironic that the man who had to forcibly detain his fiance to stop her fleeing the country in the weeks before their wedding is weighing in on how Harry should keep quiet about the British royal family treated Meghan Markle in a similar fashion...

This is what happens when Prince Albert is allowed out of the can.

At this point, I avoid any post about Depp because of all the "SHE was the abuser, he's the real victim" bullshit comments.

What that obvious Allen shill is pushing is the misinformation that pisses me off the most and is why I hate people like Woody Allen and his PR shills (one comment on a brand new account) so damn much.

You might want to listen to some of the experts the doc makers interviewed for the companion podcast to Allen v Farrow.

You should listen to the clip, because she wasn’t even really asked a question. The interviewer started to bring up some story Stone had in her book about Woody Allen, and Stone, launched into a lengthy, laudatory monologue praising Woody Allen and discussing how fantastic her experiences were with him. There was no…

John calls into the camera, “Moderation doesn’t work. Sorry!”

Sharon Stone wasn’t making that observation. She was describing her benign experiences with Woody Allen, in the context serious abuse allegations against Allen, even though the former is completely and wholly irrelevant to the latter.  Expressing that Allen didn’t abuse her is completely irrelevant to Dylan’s…

“I can say that the, while the [Allen v. Farrow] documentary may very well be a hundred percent true, it is not my experience.”

See and this is why I responded, because this type of thinking leads to exactly this situation. Where you, a stranger on the internet, are claiming I wasn’t a “true” alcoholic. Because I don’t fit some kind of mold that you’re used to. Based on very little information about me. And can you see how this type of…

This just isn’t factually based. It was my own therapist who suggested to me that abstinence is not the only way. I OD’d multiple times during 2014, 2015, 2016. And have not touched a hard drug or drank enough to have a hangover since 2018. But I do drink. I do smoke weed. Therapist actually thought the weed may help…