Yes, us silly Puritans, and our not wanting to have sex with children...

Chill, hoss. No one is going to pry the game from your cold, dead fingers. But we're allowed to discuss the perceived morals (or lack thereof) of the game. If you want games to be considered an art form so badly, that's what's going to happen.

Facepalm.

Yeah all the gratuitous PC in the news is annoying, I agree.
You know, except for when you're talking about a game where you molest kids. In fact, you know what's weird, aside from all the screenshots up above? I actually haven't seen a single person getting "outraged" about this at all.

The general mood is actually…

I can't be more disappointed with people who defend garbage like this here in the coments comparing it to violent games. Clear your eyes, retards - this game's shit not just because of morales, but more because of its gameplay! What the fuck did I just watched?! How can people seriously compare this trash to something…

I present to you Ariel Winter from Modern Family, 17 years old. Her breasts have been ridiculous for a couple of years now, though.

What is your point, exactly? Because it sounds as if you think it's "the nature of the universe" to fuck children.

First of all, you have no idea what I was taught. Second, age of consent and statutory exception are not the same thing. Third, what was creepy was that he said it as a defense to the images of sexualized children.

They're still depicting children for the pedophiles who play these games, regardless of what they say their age is.

Careful not to bring up anything about this being sexist.

Great, and the characters look like they're six years old. Fucking gross.

Way to take my entire post out of context in order to make a stupid argument.

I don't think there was enough censorship.

I don't care if pedophiles want to play the game, but they should at least say "I want to play this game because I want to pretend to feel up little girls" instead of trying to portray everyone else as puritan prudes.

Wow, because a collective North America told a Japanese-owned company to censor a game.

You know, I see this image and the only thing I can think of is "Is hell so overpopulated that they ran out of shirts to give people in their own shirt size?"

Exactly. 2D age means nothing on paper - what does mean something is what age they're drawn at. You can say they're 10 billion years old but if they look like young girls as the girls in this game do, then sexualising them is creepy, and wrong.

I think the difference is that the former examples are adults making consensual choices while this looks like your job is to molest children for irrelevant reasons.

Ummm...

Those are drawings of 8-12 year old children that grown men are masturbating to. But it's okay because their "profiles" say they're of legal age. Again, how is this legal anywhere in North America and not subject to prosecution under charges of encouraging child sexual abuse?