I thought the tail-lights were a bad photoshop, but no, that’s how they’re supposed to look? 

I was going to say the paint mismatch on the bumper vs body, the poor panel gaps, and the badges following the body line instead of being horizontal.

But I guess the wrong badging is far worse.....

I thought the crease on the driver’s door and the quarter panel were mismatched, but that’s how it’s supposed to look?

I was gonna say that it was the giant ass ugly grill, the saggy spoiler jowls, and massive double chin, that it [and every other car right now] has. But it could be the thing you pointed out, too.

This him?

Even though no one would pay 20k for this truck, we unfortunately will never get a true 100% crack pipe here. Stupid people will go against the norm just to irritate the rest of us.

The styling screams Rampage. It’s like the company designed this for the folks who really, really wanted a late-80s American front-driver ute but missed the boat and decided this would do.

Well, it *is* Kentucky.

Buying shitty cars, sure. Working on shitty cars, okay. But he’s surprisingly good at it. He gets those zombies running, somehow. Gotta give credit where it’s due, cranky.

Can we all take a moment to appreciate just how well this image summarizes the entire article?

And he still won’t learn his lesson. He obviously sucks at fixing cars and keeps buying shitty cars and working on shitty cars.

Dude. Stop.

Dude, you’ve taken some biiig liberties with the definitions in your first reply to me. Which prompted me to ask where exactly they came from. If you’re going to whip out some Keynesian economic philosophy, I’m willing to listen. But I think your scales are off in your argument. We could go on for reply after reply on…

But this is the freest part of the “free market”. According to the laws of supply and demand, and maximizing profits, I should be able to sell the same product to different people at different prices. If I can make a widget for $10, I would maximize profits if I could sell one to Person A for $11 (the most he’d be…

If ford really cared, They would make orders non-transferable. Otherwise, if someone absolutely wants one that bad that they are willing to piss away the extra just to have something 6-12 months earlier then that’s their call. Personally I would never do that but that is just me.

This might be the most well-written comment on jalopnik this week. No snark, no attempt to offend someone, just good commentary. Hell if I could have ever written it without tossing in a sarcastic comment or two. And I’m NOT being sarcastic now. Came here to laugh at those willing to spend so much over MSRP, but I’m wa…

America has been a nation of middlemen since long before you or I were born.

Meh, if some sucker, uh, Bronco customer is so desperate to drive Ford’s Jeep that they’ll pay $30K over sticker—then good for the seller providing the service.

I don’t know why, but this really doesn’t bother me at all. If someone wants to burn an extra $30k to get a Bronco 6 months or a year sooner, that’s their choice to make. 

It is what it is. I personally will not lose any sleep over people getting fleeced by paying a 60% premium to have the first new-used Bronco in town. To be able to do such a thing suggests a certain amount of financial comfort; these are not people who won’t be able to sleep under a solid roof or put food on the…