You mean like the several sections where I asked for the data backing up the claims?

Once again, the burden of proof is on those who make the claim.

Do you have anything of substance to add?

>"""There's no point in presenting facts to people like you"""

A claim not backed by any data at all… Makes someone word not meaningful at all.

You don't even understand basic science. And you refuse to learn. I've answered your question exactly the way it should be answered.

Once again, the burden of proof falls on those who make the claim. And NOT on everyone else to disprove them.

About as useless as the rest of your posts.

The burden of proof is on those who make the claim. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

>"""Again, an assumption. I haven't said whether I believe there is or isn't a pattern of sexism in Hollywood."""

Wow. So you DON"T think there is a pattern of sexism in Hollywood because you have not seen all the relevant data?

Again, wrong. You are 0 for 4 so far. You have been nothing but presumptuous and incorrect the entire time.

>"""I don't need someone to prove gravity to me,"""

>"""Ah, so your a sullen teenager who thinks every helpful suggestion is an attempt to control you. """

You made a big claim. Do you have no actual evidence to back this up?

Where is the data set that shows this?

> """Ah, a Friends fan."""

Could your flaccid argument against me be ANY weaker?

>"""Heh, I called you a moron to see if you would resort to your completely predictable "you used a mean word, so you lose the argument" retort."""

I know. Too much to ask, isn't it?