Well, you did say this article was a reprint from 2008, so the advice about the Euros being out of date which others have already flagged need not be drilled too hard here.

Said CJA:

Are they saying Emmerich wants a more realistic movie?

I'm glad to see what they can give you for $20K effects-wise.

My thought EXACTLY! Admittedly, with all the shows they film in Canada, it was only a matter of time before they raided the CBC library for content...

Um, Corey...

I want to second Chris Braak's vote and speak up in favor of Harry Mudd. He'd be the perfect villain for this day and age:

Now, maybe if they had just revived these old scripts, they might have done a lot better than what we got on Sunday...

It's not hard to imagine that he might not come back. With Auntie Beeb's financial straits leading to waves of layoffs lately, there might be a lot of pressure on him to either take a very big paycut or face a lot of "persuasion" to allow for a new, fresher, and most importantly *cheaper* talent to helm the TARDIS...

Watched it; think I liked it better the first time around...

Where do I get a d20 that lights up like that when a natural 20 is rolled?

Four demons, forty demons, four thousand demons; ain't gonna help 'em...

And the sad thing is, this moniker has a very high chance of being the man's actual name...

I noticed a lot of commentors suggesting that "James Bond" is a possible code name for an agent, the same way the "007" designation is assumed to be.

Much as I'm happy to see this stuff available in some form in one place, I have a small gripe: A lot of the shorts here that were under the LIQUID TELEVISION banner have their credits removed, which means the creators of these pieces of content aren't getting their due.

The whole scene with the transmitter atop the pyramid seemed like a major echo of Moffat's first ever DOCTOR WHO script, "The Curse of the Fatal Death." Even back in 1999, Moffat seems to have had the idea that the unverse could not do without the Doctor, a character described as "Too, nice, too brave, too kind, and…

Granted, yes; not everything is going to be A+ as you say, and there is a taste factor that is damned unidentifiable. And yes, like stock options, past performance is no indication of future returns.

Had to repost the data because the table in the original just wasn't all that clear (all data must be readable to be verifiable, after all...):

Okay, let's look at this by the numbers; at the end of Cyriaque's assessment, things stand thus:

Coming next week: The newest title as part of the New 53 from DC: