Is this really how he wants to spend his time? Total solar eclipses are really hard to come by.

They're an odd couple. That pair of answers together is just great.

I feel like you have to keep any streaming ribbons locked up when she's around or she'll just start dancing and flinging them about 24/7. I think she'd drive me utterly insane if we were, say, roommates, but I can't help but admire her gonzo commitment to…whatever it is she does.

Grim middle-stretch, indeed. This would be damn great EP if you mush the beginning and end together.

I was terribly underwhelmed by Gabriel's album of covers, but that version of 'Heroes' is definitely damn good.

I feel stupid and bad for assuming he'd be kinda washed up by now. These clips look and sound great!

I assumed this meant "would it hold a child's interest?", although that's probably a safe bet, too. McCartney isn't, say, Rush. He loves hooks and melodies.

It continues, though: "It was a shitty position, and Spicer acquitted himself terribly, but there was a pitiable quality to him that leavened the mood." That shitty-acquitted-pitiable thing. Good stuff, with the nice release of "leavened" to follow it up.

In principle, I'm laughing right now.

For some strange reason I've seen Medeski Martin and Wood 6 times, I'm not even that big of a fan. It just happened.

Is that relevant? Isn't the "e" dropped in these cases? "Hoping", "writing", "joking", etc?

Eh, he's still doing better than 99.9% of actors. He's been in a film, in a play, or on TV pretty much non-stop, even if in lower-profile gigs.

Alien: Resurrection wasn't a great script, AND the director did it wrong.

Fourth season was a real mess, although IMO really only the final episode is unforgiveable.

Things could be worse, though:
ICD-10-CM R11.13: Vomiting of fecal matter

I'm a big fan of unusual and/or unpleasant clinical diagnosis codes. For you, I have: ICD10-CM G43.A1: Cyclical vomiting, intractable

That's not what "misinformation" *means*. Sample definition: "false or inaccurate information, especially that which is deliberately intended to deceive." None of that can apply to the things you bring up re: Starship Troopers. It can't be false, it can't be inaccurate, and there's nothing to "deceive" about.

I understand it's literature.

Jenny Agutter…sigh…

I think you're communicating your thoughts well. It's more of your complete inability to understand others that's a problem.