jamboxdotcom
jamboxdotcom
jamboxdotcom

Men as a group were never denied property ownership. There was never a law that said “no make person can own property.” Indeed, when men fought for their civil rights here in the US in the 18th century, they used those rights to enact laws denying women rights. So that argument is pure silliness. Also, moving the

99% of men throughout history did not need to fight for the right to perform labor like mining. What are you talking about? When in history were men as a group prevented from working?

Once again - nothing you say here is correct.

So you couldn’t respond to the point that women had to sue to work in mines so you just pretended it didn’t happen. Ineffectual, but cute to see this dishonest sort of argument in action again. And, yeah, women have been fighting to be able to advance and do more in the military for years. And, surprise! If you make

Notice how women had to sue to be allowed to do work like mining? I guess you missed the movie “North Country.” Generally, when people have to engage in challenging class action lawsuits to do work, they don’t end up doing it in droves. So yeah, that social outcome was caused by discrimination and a longstanding

Men are the majority of prisoners and murder victims because men are more violent. And I’m not sure how doing a lot of “manual labor” is per se discrimination. Did you mean “unskilled labor”? Because that would be more relevant to your point.

Harvard and Google are being sued for discriminating against men.

Where is it happening? Gee, maybe where people like Harvery Weinstein and Bill Cosby were able to abuse women for decades and get away with it?

They misunderstand that he whipped out his dick and masturbated in front of women who looked up to him and thought of him as a mentor? Katie was unprofessional for reporting on that relevant news story on an entertainment website? Give it a rest, man.

some change of rules

She admitted to leaving him for another man, and one kiss. If you care about accuracy.

So many mad dudes in their feelings because an abuser of women got called out.

If a woman was the older and more financially/professionally established party, then the power dynamic would favor the woman. Power dynamics have nothing to do with absolving women. They exist independent of gender. Unfortunately, this is a patriarchal society that has only relatively recently welcomed women into the

He somehow took this post about an abusive relationship and turned it into a screed on confederate monuments, I think? It’s creative, I’ll give him that.

Honestly what are you even trying to get at here?

Legal age is only that: legal age. It has nothing to do with actual social dynamics that continue to evolve and change in adulthood, especially between men and women. Not to mention disparate career and financial positions that are likely going to manifest between someone in their 20s and someone in their 40s.

“How does him being older present some ‘power dynamic’ imbalance when she’s of legal age?”

I think that too sometimes, then I remember that the Tom Green Show and Epic Movie were things when I was younger so maybe it just takes different forms for different generations

It’s strange to think that “10-year-old who cheats at Mad-Libs by reading them first”-level humor gets this much attention.

That’s why I maintain that he’s a complete fraud, a concern troll, or a non-native-English-ing spambot that’s gained sentience. No way a real person could spout the things he does.