To play devil’s advocate, there’s no legal basis for banning “pay to win” . He says it’s similar to going to a casino, but it’s not at all - P2W is a known product, for a known price. It’s no more illegal than a child ordering a toy from amazon with their parents account. There is no legal argument for protecting…

People giving ASS shade for his second reason sound insane and like they’ve honestly never experienced a relationship.

Yeah, sure, maybe outright saying “my SO doesn’t seem as smart as me” is in bad form, but do people seriously think everyone is at the same level intellectually? Or engages with things to the same…

“Feeling like you can’t have a conversation with your SO over topics you both find interesting means it’s your problem”

Except how she has always been a vengeful lunatic promising to burn and destroy cities, sure. Not paying attention to the start of the series, I take it?

There is no legal basis that supports a ban on P2W stuff.

No, I’m applying the society of Westeros. People who take over make the laws and deem what they did to be legal. The Targaryens had a conquest, and then deemed themselves kings. Robert had a conquest, and deemed himself king. Etc etc. It’s like Bronn said - everyone got to where they are by their ancestors starting…

Her entire “breaking the wheel” speech was about how there shouldn’t be houses and bloodlines. Seems she already injected modern sensibilities. If her basis for ruling is going to be one centered on lineage, she should recognize Jon has the better claim, and stand down. It’s really only because she wants it, has been…

No it doesn’t. Iron Islanders are invaders themselves, so it’s legal. That’s their thing. It certainly has no legal implication if he did it because his dad was mean or if he was conflicted about attacking his friends. Dany is an invader, no more right in what she’s doing than any other house invading to take over…

“If you win the generic lottery and are literally gifted superweapons, it’s not entitled to think you deserve to be the ruler of another continent!”

“Believing to be in the right” has zero relevance on whether something is illegal or legal. Either the law of warfare in Westeros “it is legal to execute those who don’t submit” or “it is not legal to execute those who don’t submit”. It’s not contingent on knowing the emotions of who that invader is.

You’re kidding, right?

There was that part in season...2? where Robb captures a Lannister scout who was [mis]counting the Stark army regiment, and lets him go to spread misinformation.

My favorite part was when Benioff literally says Dany forgot about the Iron Fleet (despite being told about it like a scene prior).

Trying to compare the sum of the bad things Obama did and the sum of bad things Trump did is the very height of false equivalence. 

Yeah, that one act by Obama not only makes him as bad as Trump, it also is just as strongly indicative of the bigotry of his supporters as all this hate-crime-increase data is of Trump supporters

Should sports be split by male/female?

Is swimming already divided into groups by lactic acid amount? Because running (and most sports) are already divided into male/female. 

Is swimming already separated by height? 

Seems fair. Unlike height, arm span, or joint flexibility, sports are already set up to distinguish those who are genetically closer to “male”, and those who are genetically closer to “female”, and for good reason - the former group absolutely destroys the latter in certain events, based on physical features. Plus,…

Oh no, the memes are winning! What shall we do! Oh, right, the world order is pushing back against you types; soon enough, it’ll all be gone. It’ll be great :D