I’m mostly leary about k-pop groups in general, given the proximity they would necessarily have to have to the particularly loathesome and exploitative k-pop industry.

This BTS stuff is kinda baffling to me. I checked twitter yesterday, and BTS related subjects were *every single trending topic worldwide*. That is patently insane. 

Exactly my point. It’s not. Anti-abortion people are about forcing their opinions on those who are no more incorrect to feel another way. It’s about control for them, because they’re monsters. 

“Yeah! And just what the hell is an ‘of’ here anyway!”

Pretty much. I went to HS in the Northeast, and the only time I ever heard anyone care about USC was when they were forced to put it on their lists as a safety. Heck, *Berkeley* was seen as a safety school for most people I knew; the only person I’m aware of who went there was seen in my HS as having dropped the ball…

Remember, much like rapists, anti-abortion people are primarily about control. They don’t listen to reason or debate; they want to control women’s bodies. Fight them at every turn.

Weird take.

No one went with ketchup first; you all lose.

Found the 30% person!

*20% minimum

Let’s not rule out the big hearted commentariat who are falling over themselves to drop 30% on a real pristine bagging job.

Yep. I tip fine, but the second someone is going to tell me how *much* to tip, or get *mad* at me for how much I tip, I’d “HAH” so loud and so sharply it would probably break the glasses on the table.

Not necessarily, no. Imagine if Xbox was around for 15 years, had a whole slew of features, didn’t overcharge for games (and in fact had frequent sales), had people building up their friends lists, and then Sony comes in, hugely lacking in features, not competing on price, and just buying exclusives. Just some vague…

First off, Valve has tiered revenue splits too. These big devs? They would have gotten it down to 20%, for an 8% difference. Secondly, I don’t care, because devs are not consumers. I said it does nothing good for consumers, and indeed, that split means that in some regions, processing fees are passed onto consumers.

A miss is a good as a mile. If there’s any negatives - and there are - and no actual positives - and there aren’t - then it’s a bad thing as a whole, and dismissing people’s concerns is never a good look. 

I mean, no, you claimed there could be a positive, when I said that historically thay winds up not being the case, and then pointed to several negatives which you ignored because of your own personal feelings.

I’m under 30, but it’s not about what I enjoy. Heck, I barely use the Steam functions, but who would I be to say “I unilaterally will decide what other people as a population get to care about”? It’s about what it offers everyone, which is nothing. If a game is on both, Steam is the better option, every time. There is…

Ok, well, so if people care, then those are features. It’s not a mystery. This isn’t about what one person or another likes themselves, it’s about the totality of the PC player base. And EGS offers them...nothing.

Features are the future; customers shouldn’t feel obligated to weigh some nebulous feature set of the future. Imagine doing that for literally anything else. Consumers compare in the here and now, not the virtues of infinite potential.

Is there cross play between steam? Or is the solution supposed to be “have everyone move over to a service not everyone wants to use”?

So what you’re saying is because you don’t care about those things personally, there is no way anyone else could care and if they do, they’re wrong, and not only are they wrong, they need to stop and just accept it. See, that’s not a very compelling reason.