It was your last line that did it for me. Why should Bryan Cranston sit out the next couple of plays? You don’t like what he’s saying, so he shouldn’t therefore say things?

Sean needed that to further underline the “Cranston is out of touch!” narrative.

This interview spreading with headline that Cranston “says they deserve a a second chance”. Out of context and not completely accurate. So yes, this article is click bait & it’s also disrespectful to Cranston and the victims.

It’s the entire thrust of what he said.

Fuck you. You literally put the word “redemption” in quotation marks and called it “unfortunate.” Do you think that rehabilitation of criminal offenders is a farce? A joke? Do you think that once someone has committed an offense, they should be stripped of all rights? All humanity? All chance to contribute to society?…

The problem is that most people won’t read past the headline, let alone far enough into the article that Cranston’s comments have any kind of context. As a result, you get a flood of mean-spirited rubberneckers excoriating Cranston on social media because what they got from the headline is that the man thinks sexual…

It’s awfully easy for us to forgive people from behind our computers when their victims live with the harm those “forgiven” caused to them every hour of every day. The reason I tentatively support Cranston’s statement is that he prioritized the forgiveness of the victims — if they don’t forgive, neither should we. If…

I’ve noticed a general increase in “clickbait bullshit” on the gizmodo/splinter/deadspin universe over the last few weeks. It’s unfortunate. AV Club seems to be the worst of all the platforms when it comes to this. I guess Univision is pushing them to get more clicks.

Sorry, Sean, you may have caught the brunt of my ire at the way many around me have been treating the situation. I admit that I was chomping at the bit to articulate my disdain for the lack of context with which his comments have been treated, and so, paired with the headline, your byline on this article made my heart…

Sean — and I say this with an incredible amount of respect for you as a writer (one of my favorites on the internet), a journalist, and a person — this is legitimately clickbait bullshit. The mountain of qualifiers heaped in the second half of this article practically unwrites the first and proves that point. Except…

Your username seems counterintuitive to the thought that a person should repress their opinions to make you feel better.

Troll comments/commenters like this are cancer. This was already heavily commented on, but can we try not to reply to or upvote shit like this in the future, people? It does nothing. People who like Google shit will buy Google shit. People who like Apple shit will buy Apple shit. And some people just want to know how…

No, its to cover up that the only thing he can think about is high school boys’ penises.

I think the point of the complaint is that “truly wireless earbuds” — like the AirPods that these are directly competing against — don’t need a cord, and if you decide to cut the cord on the Google buds, they won’t work anymore. Sure, the string is nice for people who want to just let them hang on their neck when…

Yeah, but have you ever been to Northern Utah? This is pretty high up on the list of things to do. Pictured, the petitioning parent:

It will rise again...just give it like 20 minutes.

Split the difference, adopt the Penix as a mascot:

I was practicing some cheers for the upcoming school year with a couple of my neighbors just for fun.

Don Cheadle is great, I’m on board with this.

The answer to nearly everything.