The Tri-Valley is thirty minutes away from me, I don't own a vehicle of any kind and I can't remember the last time I made a substitution you condescending prick. I answered your question and then you tell me those people don't matter. You're talking out your ass, you don't know shit and I called you on it. Buh-bye.

You're a troll. Nothing personal, I'm sure you believe the things you're saying. But your wrong. *shrug*

Technically, chefs don't get Michelin stars. The restaurant gets the star and the head chef gets credit for it. No restaurant can have more than three. Joel Robuchon, Alane Ducasse, Martin Beresategeui, Gordon Ramsey, Thomas Keller, Yoshihiro Murata, etc etc etc…. because there's a ton of places to look and I'm tired…

Regardless, you aren't denying that you were completely wrong about his experience. You have some angry agenda against Bourdain, cool. But your opinion doesn't equal quantifiable fact.

Nonsense. It's easy enough to know about who is hot in the chef/restaurant business. If you aren't hearing ANYTHING about them, they aren't shit.

Ummm, your information on Anthony Bourdain might be a little bit off there. Like, wikipedia is pretty easy to use. If I felt like bothering I could find you quotes from many of the worlds most respected chefs singing Bourdains praise as a chef, a writer, a food expert, etc. He actually has DECADES of real world…

Guy Fieri is whatever. The is issue is a bigger one than your question, for me. For me the issue is why can't Guy Fieri be Guy Fieri without so many people feeling as though it's necessary to have something to say about him one way or the other? If you like him, support his shows and his restaurants. If you don't like…

It has a surprisingly good re-watch factor, too.

I think there's a pretty good conversation to be had around the parts Johnny Depp played in Donnie Brasco, Blow and Black Mass (and he could certainly add to that group in the future). I'm not exactly sure what that conversation is just yet, but I think it's in there.

People hate pretty hard on Event Horizon, but I saw that movie in the theater three times because I wanted to take people to see it. I think it played better on a big screen with a group of people watching in a darkened theater. I watched it at home a few years later and it hit me the same way.

I don't care that it's not Pulp Fiction, Jackie Brown just isn't that good. It's slow, plodding, mostly boring. I never cared about it while watching, not even a little bit. It's the same problem I have with Hateful 8. And if Good Will Hunting was released in 1997, then you left the best movie of 1997 off your list.…

I agree with you, so I guess I'm going to have to re-watch. I believe that's part of what was meant to be so powerful about the dragon lighting the entire caravan on fire. They were destroying food supplies and melting gold. I got the impression the gold was on the way, but not there yet, and now it's not going to get…

Between two friends who share one of the purest and longest lasting relationships on the show, at this point.

My mostly serious new opinion about who is going to win; the Night King and the White Walkers. They're going to bring down the wall and winter will follow them all the way to the Red Keep.

Is this a trick question? Is it a joke? People still line up to buy each new iPhone model. Sometimes even FINANCING them, because they cost so damn much. I'm assuming you actually know this and your question here was rhetorical. Regardless, I totally agree.

I love No Country For Old Men and love Almost Famous even more, but I'll throw There Will Be Blood into this conversation.

Bad. Not mysterious. Bad. And it pisses me off every time I watch it. It's a near perfect movie with a bad ending.

I don't necessarily disagree, but I still enjoyed Flesh and Bone more. Probably because I dated a dancer for ten years so I related to Flesh and Bone much, much more than The Girlfriend Experience.

Doo eet.

Seems reasonable.