God, imagine if they deleted a bunch of tech regs for 2020 just for the hell of it, just to give us one single shining glorious year of technical insanity before doubling down on technical and budget restrictions.

I can’t say it’s unexpected, but I can still be disappointed in the terrible loopholes of capitalism.

$200B a year in revenue, $17M a year in compensation. His compensation was .0085% (that’s .000085) of revenue. Seems reasonable to me.

Footballers for one

Personally I think I would have put Skyrim above Dark Souks.

5th Gear:

Did I mention speeds? I mentioned bumps. Perhaps even suspension issues. And do not even begin to tell me that Indycars can’t handle suspension stress.

Can we all recognize how mediocre/bad Lance Stroll is this year.

7th and 8th for McLaren is incredible given where they were last year. Also, I just found out about a “beta” unofficial F1TV roku app, so I’m looking forward to watching live on a big screen tomorrow.

Counterpoint: Jalopnik doesn’t use cars to push socialism and Orange-Man-Bad syndrome. Pretty sure we’ll be fine as long as the Deadspin and Splinter commenters who don’t have a home don’t invade this place. Gizmodo was pretty much instantly overrun with Splinter leftovers. The comments section there went from…

I don’t care if they recline back to the point where they are curled up in my lap. Just don’t do disgusting shit like take off your shoes, change baby diapers in the main cabin (on the tray, no less!), or clip nails.

The joke had so much potential. But he chose United. Which was a poor decision. (Although in his defense, this is an automobile centric blog)

stay tuned to Road & Track where I’m coming on as Associate Editor

The median age of a car on the road in the USA is ~11 years.

I mean, it’s pretty rude to ask a softball question of a soccer coach.

Yeah, even more closely it’s like getting mad at Spotlight for not telling the victims stories from their perspective (as I said in my comment).

It’s like being mad at All the President’s Men for focusing on Woodward and Bernstein instead of doing a deep dive on the Nixon presidency.

It was about the process of getting the story published and the institutional bullshit that protected people like Lauer and Weinstein. I don’t think it minimizes anything about the victims, it’s just about a different-ish topic? It’s like being mad at All the President’s Men for focusing on Woodward and Bernstein…

Agreed. Seriously, I’m really hoping we aren’t on a trend of Jalop articles making fun of authorities when they get very specific on making rulings. Fine, keep the stupid click-bait titles, but this is just as bad as Andrew’s article saying that circuit court in Michigan was saying that forgetting to put the bolts…

The book is about NBC killing the story and Farrow trying to get it published.