The article mentions why the judge finds your assertion incorrect. 

And if you really want it, the full transcript:

Hi everyone, my name’s Meredith with Lifehacker.com and today we’re talking about all the ways you might be making your house look cheap and tacky. It’s great to make sure that your home feels like you, but at the same time there’s some decorating choices that can make…

In case you don’t want to watch the video:

Well, this is a stupid take.  

how many forzas now have they had to fix the rubber banding issue???  i played the original and had so many cars come from 30 seconds back to win on the last straight. 

it seems ridiculous that a party that won 11.5 percent of the vote could prevent a policy wanted by 60 percent of people.

I know one thing scarier than the car loans - is the software behind this website. It takes a pretty crazy amount of effort to crash Chrome browser with ads. Somehow they figured it out.

There you go with reasonable facts and data to refute a story. Take your star. Still, this sure explains how so many people are driving around in $60k trucks. 

It doesn’t take a crystal ball to see where things go from here — just a passing look at what happened a decade ago.

To be helpful, not to pile on:

Yeah, you might want to make some corrections, Ryan? The subheader, too, says “5th.” And Enea Bastianini finished on the podium for 3rd, passing Quartararo on the final lap. I mean, thanks for covering MotoGP, but, you know, journalism: facts and accuracy.

“However in an unbelievable turn of events, Quartararo would find himself finishing third and become world champion.”

“Honda is leaving, so Honda should take over.”

“The Wall Street Journal is a newspaper that fundamentally loves successful business. These stories are not bad, necessarily, even though they celebrate capitalism”

I was led to believe that F1 was losing drivers to INDY?

Not to mention, this is not exactly breaking stuff here. Almost everything links back to a 10 year old reddit thread. Even the linked source for a lot of it (screenrant) is a 2018 blog that pretty much just regurgitates (many links embedded) the Reddit post and a HuffPost story.

This should be an automatic plug for former Jalop Tavarish’s rebuild of the PMR van

This stuff is getting worse. I mean Jalopnik has always played fast and loose with the concept of editing, but it’s getting eye-opening at this point.

But even that didn’t help as a lot of constants weren’t old enough to rent a car, or the money that was given wasn’t enough. One constant ended up pocketing what was left and figured the rest out.

uh, I think you are missing the 2005 entire season where by rule tire changes were not allowed. probably cost Kimi the WDC at McLaren when he had a flatspotted tire vibrate the front suspension to death (and nearly him)