Schrodinger’s Supercharger.

Crack Pipe, but let me explain:

Obviously it will be called the BMW Z6i GranCabrio iPerformance i35i GranJapanisch VISION Supreme THE NEXT 100 YEARS OF WAITING FOR TOYOTA TO GIVE THIS THING MORE POWER iCantAffordThis RIPV6AccordCoupe RIPHondaBrosAllOverTheWorld.

Just on a comparative basis, you needed 36% more power at 70mph than you did at 60mph. I used a cD of .50 and frontal area of 40sqft (3.7162 m2) in Wolfram Alpha’s drag calculator for that... drag force of 835.5N at 60mph, 1137N at 70mph.

Based on recent performances in the pee-wee drift circuit (“Cars and Coffee-D)“ our prospects don’t look promising.

Rather than purchase a car from either company, you can now invest directly in the Saleen-Hennessey Investment Trust (SHIT). There’s no more efficient financial instrument for disposing of unwanted capital.

Torch, I think this is good stuff. Love this sort of thing. But, let’s go a step further and compare to inflation-adjusted median incomes. From the BEA, via FRED (which is awesome), Disposable Personal Income Per Capita from 1959-Present, in 2009 Dollars (So, income less taxes.)

Why the hell would you drop your sandbags for qualifying for a 24 hour race? How much of an advantage can a few grid positions at the start possibly be? Which begs the question how many of the other teams, potentially including ones which got a performance boost, are playing the long game and still haven’t dropped…

I never did understand that claim. The seatbelt/harness’s job is to help dissipate and distribute the force of deceleration across your body. More contact points = less force concentrated on any part of your body. I googled 3-point seatbelts vs harnesses, and the one page that even suggested a harness might be less…

Ha ha. Make a 2 door 3-series and call it the Grand Sedan for no fucking reason at all.

Burger King*