While that may be true, it wasn’t near enough.

We all know what happened to them, they stayed at home. Many of them were likely independent, some democrat, and some republican. Nearly all of them disliked both candidates, and figured voting 3rd party was a waste of time.

Just let it die already, it was a horrible prototype. Either through bad design, or Nissan simply not funding it properly or putting in the effort, it was horrible.

Yeah, it’d be nice to see something like that go to someone that truly deserves it, and would treat it right....just keep it away from crowds, mmmkay?

Hey now, it’s only recently that hatchbacks have become the ugly things we so despise. In the 80s and 90s (and to a much lesser degree, the late 70s), most hatchbacks were things of beauty.

But when the article stated that a GT500 could achieve 189mph, they’re talking about a 662hp car with 631lb-ft of torque. Hell, a basic 5th gen Camaro SS with just 426hp tops out at 174.4mph, per PM.

Prints help hide printing, it’s brilliant!

If what you say were true, then they’ve been failing at that for the past several decades (that I know of).

Actually, it seems more like you painted yourself into a corner, and now attempt to use facetiousness and a facade of humor to deflect. Bravo, you have all the proper makings of a good (or more accurately, good at being bad) politician.

Oh, I still am, because you conveniently ignored some things. How do you suppose large ships will get to the Georgia strait, eh bud? Why, through the Haro strait of course, you know, the one I specifically mentioned earlier in a post.

You’re painting with too broad a brush. You see, many things get lumped in with the label of “manufacturing”. Oil, natural gas, and fuel production are generally included with that, as well as many other things that aren’t truly “manufacturing”.

Well if you’re in the Navy, then I would expect you to understand a very simple thing called “draft”.

It’s not all doom and gloom as you state:

There are, but at the end of the day, they are our territorial waters, and no one really disputes that. It wouldn’t be very difficult for us to take our ball and go home, as it were.

Because the majority of the strait of Juan De Fuca and the Haro strait are in U.S. territorial waters. If we’re going to go nuclear on trade agreements, then that also means taxing goods being transported through our territorial waters, or outright denying them altogether.

If the EC went faithless? Yes, I’m sure it would. Here’s the truth of the matter:

Maybe not, but in saying:

You conveniently forget how Canada is going to trade with Mexico without coming through the U.S. first. They can’t use the west coast, and traveling up from the Gulf of Mexico to the eastern seaboard of Canada is going to be very, very expensive.

You do realize that resistive touchscreens are actually newer than capacitive, right?

The congressional minority can’t do much, as the facts prove: