jackslateriv
Jack Slater 4
jackslateriv
Now playing

I watched the trailer multiple times and couldn’t find where they actually called them deplorables. Maybe there’s a second trailer I can’t find?

This is the sort of thing that reminds us that wikipedia, wiki anything, is never reliable on anything controversial.

Thing is, in 1999 audiences left theaters satisfied, almost giddy, with Episode 1. Darth Maul was the character with the biggest impact and the climatic battle ended a 16 year light saber battle drought. It was in the years that followed that the nerd echo chamber exploded and public derision for the film came to the

Naw, that’s literally you. Come from poverty and still manage to care about both humans and dogs, and absolutely would not abuse one. Maybe it’s regional, or cultural, or -al I can’t think of off the top of my head. Not trying to make you feel bad or anything here, just don’t want to be lumped in that.

But it’s not a

When are people going to move on from YouTube celebrities. They are useless and unnecessary, basically human nuisances. I don’t even understand how it’s entertaining to watch .

Boy, I sure hope the Animal Cruelty department comes down hard on her. That kind of treatment is absolutely unacceptable.

I’ll just head right over to Kinja Deals for the best price we’ve seen yet on this BlueTooth speaker on Amazon while I’m mulling over this piece.

Many, many people.

They’re not doing it for the sake of, or for “improvements” or beauty preference or anything superficial - they’re doing it because we have a very specific point of reference for how these kids look in that role in 2017. I think it’s perfectly fine to apply this tech for this purpose - especially since kids can change

It’s hard to argue with this mansplaining article. 

Yeah, generally they’re only going to stick to a woman’s criticisms of anyone around here so long as it stays relevant to whatever point they’re determined to hammer through each article (especially Rich, whose opinion on anything is not something I’m ever going to trust, particularly on anything to do with women,

You’re wrong at about every single turn here. If you think Tarantino was taking swipes at Thurman and that situation, would Thurman have allowed her daughter to be in the movie? If all you took from the movie was that it was a long ramble about the good old days, then you didn’t get it. I’m sorry that good work is

I just searched the word “beyonce” on the Jezebel search function and I have some unfortunate news about putting artist-worship above quality of work for you

The argument that Tarantino doesn’t write important roles for women only holds water if you haven’t seen any of his movies.

What are you saying? there should be a quota a film needs to meet?

Somehow it makes sense to me that an important character involved in the main plot split among many important characters, but not the main character in the film, should get only 10% of the lines.

The plot is about another (fictional) character that gets involved in a complex real-world event that Sharon Tate was only

I don’t know that you can really go after him on black speaking roles. His last two films, The Hateful Eight and Django Unchained, were led by strong black characters, and he does wonderful things with Samuel L Jackson in Pulp Fiction and Jackie Brown, and three of the main leads in Death Proof are black women.

It’s just a movie. Not everything needs to be a source of outrage.

Why is a dude telling woman what to be outraged about? What a twat. 

I don’t get the non speaking black actors comment......