No but what I’m saying is what is the point of investing your money, buying real estate, and 401k’s, CD’s etc if at the end of your life it all just goes away, and no one but the government sees a cent?

No doubt some of those proceeds should go there, but not 100% after all Aunt Tilly worked hard as shit to buy that nail file collection. But there’s no changing your mind.

Why? So we should all just shoot for doing a little less well than we can? Why not just try and make as much as you can? And again it’s not a matter of whether or not the system needs to be changed because it does, but calling for a 100% tax on anything is radical and works only to divide.

So what happens fifty years from now when inheritance is non-existent? What do you have to work towards? The state will just come in and take everything anyway, so what’s the point of having any type of ambition whatsoever? It sounds like a BS line to say that more state support equals less drive in terms of…

Why should that happen? I agree that the health effects of playing football are horrible, and I wouldn’t want my children playing, but I mean most of the player love the game and probably wouldn’t agree with you. If anything the money (at least some of it) should go to players as a living stipend so they can afford…