jace123
Jace123
jace123

The most well-known case of discrimination thus far came from a Guangzhou McDonalds, which posted a sign explicitly stating “black people are not allowed to the restaurant.”

Can’t let god do all the work, after all.

Huh. Been reading this site for years and only now realized it’s pronounced Fay-hey, not Fah-hey...

Because they have an ownership bias.

True, but not as many partner with a British company (or shell company, anyway), which is I think is the real reason this game caught Gomez’s lawyers’ attention.

According to the article, they partnered with a British company this time, so maybe that’s the gap in their armor this time around.

So what you’re saying is.... governments need to start offering stylish parasols to incentivize good social behavior? I can get behind that.

We are the future.

Considering the age of consent in France is 15 (!?), perhaps his crime is seen as less horrifying?

Everyone wanted him to lose his cool. He didn’t do it.

Someone also once told me:

Hedonist? ;)

Probably the best picture you could have chosen. Kudos

I don’t know... it seems like right now, the period of time *before* a nascent Pandemic really becomes a pressing issue, is the best time to be concerning yourself over it.

I think I get where you’re coming from... even a “blow hard’s” support shouldn’t be discouraged, whatever their reason for voicing it is. It still adds to the generally positive outlook the public consciousness has toward the Hong Kong protesters.

As much fun as that would be, I doubt it would get that far. Recent Jurisprudence is that Political speech does not even need to be true to defend against slander (which is insane, in my opinion). That’s why Stormy Daniels ended up paying legal costs in her lawsuit vs Trump, if you recall.

So one of the politicians who supported the war in Iraq, and is famous for inappropriately sniffing and touching women.... is calling someone who makes violent games a creep.

Given pretty much all the male Trumps dress this way, I’m thinking this is an affectation at this point. I imagine it has to do with the fiction they promote about them being wealthy through personal effort rather than inheriting their riches. They *want* to look as appallingly nouveau riche as possible, never mind

What? They’re amazing creatures! I’m told you can learn everything there is to know about them in a month yet, even after a hundred years, Hobbits can still surprise you.