This probably isn’t being fair, but at a guess, here are a few possible reasons:

What? But then he’d have to work, like, two jobs to put a roof over his head.

I’d say no (at least, not without a new court order.). The evidence was seized as part of the discovery process in Epstein’s case. No case without a defendant, hence, no discovery. The evidence reverts back to private property owned by whoever controls Epstein’s estate. Sounds like a whole lot of legal complications…

Given their search history is likely vastly (and morally) different from a normal person, do you think it’s possible for their search results to turn up something like this? I understand google does tend to tailor results a little per user.

I’m not a fan myself, especially given certain political tensions between my country and theirs. That said, the food thing is decidedly a cultural thing and not really a greed thing. It was hilariously illustrated in an HSBC commercial some years back.

Odd. I suppose it was a treatise dealing exclusively with civilian settings? Armor was still very much a thing during the renaissance and it would have been the rare sword school that didn’t teach stuff about it. My understanding is that it wasn’t until around the late 17th century (close to the Napoleonic era) that…

Fiore, I should think. The assumption was that armor makes regular sword combat ineffective, so grappling was more effective choice.

Depends on the context, I imagine. Sometimes you’re going to have people both sorta unwilling to risk a hit, just poking at each other and retreating in a panic when the other goes on the offensive. Seen the modern equivalent of fights like that go for several minutes. Other times, both people are less interested in…

An additional benefit is that an impeachment complaint opens investigations to the public in a way that Mueller’s 300 page digest of “Meaningfully Not Saying Things” simply cannot.

I dunno. I always figured alien conspiracy nuts to be on the left (less heavily armed) side of the political spectrum. It should turn out fine as long as word doesn’t get out that big foot is also being held in Area 51 (thanks, Kyle…).

As my wife often reminds me, we are neither expected nor required to put on makeup nor wear heels so we should probably not complain about our neck ribbons overmuch.

Legal issues aside, why on earth would anyone complain if Trump wanted to talk to them less.

I’m going to assume you replied to the wrong person as that post I made is from 2018, the context of which appears to differ from whatever you meant to reply to.

Yikes. Now I’m sorry I missed the show. What did Beto sing for the “sing for your life” portion? (I assume he got the least votes)

Well, to be fair, George Washington was a racist slave owner.

IT HAS NEVER WORKED IN HE PAST.

Oh, nice, what legs are those on your SAM, Heather?

Ah. The false choice fallacy. Still not new or interesting.