Sure, but what do you do if the game developers have decided to balance beating particular challenges around the assumption that you’re outfitted with $500 blues?  Just accept that you’re never going to play that part of the game?

The trailer is definitely jammed, but the actual anime is well cut. Trigger is very stylish with how they frame and pace, but it’s not close to near snappy and frenetic as the trailer puts it. Though their way of animating is definitely fast, it’s not choppy, which is what I like.

Not hugely. Transphobia and misogyny are broad, oppressive forces, but the combo of transmisogyny is particularly potent. Especially when people of color are involved (guess which women get accused of being trans more often?)

If you left sports to private clubs, then you’d be isolating a shit ton of underprivileged kids that ONLY get exposure to extracurriculars through public schools. If you’ve ever gone through club sports (or performing arts for that matter) AND through your school’s sport, you’d already know that the cost and travel…

Congratulations Blizzard. You managed to make a pay to lose game.

This is often done by bodypainters, and is in no way meant to be wearable fashion. It’s goofing around with visuals, and that’s about it.

Whoa, it’s almost like runway fashion isn’t meant for everyday use?!?

At least the Ouya actually happened, though. There’s zero chance of this thing ever existing.

Not at all surprising that the first NFT game on the store would just be using asset flips for a quick buck, which seems to be the main purpose of NFTs in general. I’ve yet to see a concept for using NFTs that would work and that can’t already be done with your typical account based systems.

“Gameplay of Grit” Shows dude aiming gun and shooting in an empty room. Yeah that is worse than I expected.

Not even you seem to be capable of doing so in your own article activating for shilling this scam, how on earth could you fill a whole article with it?

That's because sometimes there aren't two sides to a story. In this case NFT's are a scam and printing stories that suggests they aren't is doing a disservice to the people reading the story. 

This isn’t a case of Kotaku being paid to crap on NFTs. This is a case of “everyone is telling you that it sucks except the people who want to get rich off you.” The idea is outright terrible from the perspective of anyone who actually consumes games (and fantastic from the perspective of anyone who wants to sell NFTs…

Considering what happened? Yeah, he was. But then most of these dudes were. They bought what Holmes was selling wholesale, and it’s baffling. Everyone wanted this to work so bad that they refused to see what was right in front of them. 

This is one of those things that I think many people still don’t understand. A sophmore chemical engineering student hasn’t even completed organic chemistry yet. It doesn’t matter how bright someone is, the applied sciences behind medical testing go way beyond what is taught in basic undergraduate courses. Even…

The person with whom I’m watching this asked me if Elizabeth Holmes is actually smart. I mean, she had to be, right?

You would THINK that Theranos (and other spectacular startup failures) would teach people that the silicon valley mirage of “one extraordinary person with a unique vision” is, well, a mirage. A line about Theranos with some folks was that it was just unfortunate that a startup was tangled in with the medical field, as…

I read the book, saw the doc and ingested so much of this story already that I should be tired of it by now. But the cast is great and it’s very entertaining. But it’s ultimately Amanda Seyfried’s performance that makes it compelling. She looks like a fashion model and has been in so many just O.K. vehicles that it…

The show wants to understand how Holmes went from an eccentric and potentially brilliant healthcare innovator to a cold, calculating huckster capable of sociopathic levels of deception.

I don’t get why everyone is so eager to praise sociopathic con artists. In this case, for instance, you call Holmes “an eccentric and potentially brilliant healthcare innovator”. In reality, she didn’t innovate anything, and there’s no reason to think she had the potential for brilliance. I could announce tomorrow…