Unfortunately, the DA tried their best case first. They had a lot of good circumstantial evidence on this one. The others are just he said/she said that his attorneys will destroy.
Unfortunately, the DA tried their best case first. They had a lot of good circumstantial evidence on this one. The others are just he said/she said that his attorneys will destroy.
The rapes didn’t happen at or around the same time though. You can admit evidence of prior bad acts to show an MO if it’s not overly prejudicial but if he hasn’t been convicted of those crimes yet they’re just allegations
You can’t try three cases at the same time that have nothing to do with each other except the defendant.
It didn’t not work, unfortunately.
It should also be mentioned that he made these comments to a jury made up of 11, eleven!, women and 3 men. Apparently, it didn’t bother them too much, because they just found him not guilty.
I’ve had this happen to me twice that I can remember. Once, in college (like I had any money), the other just after I graduated. I was a political science major, so on both occasions I just hi-jacked their pitches by extolling the tenants and virtues of Communism. They both gave up pretty quickly. To this day, those…
The only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a baby with a gun