Yes, but 18 year olds are adults. The money her father left for her should be turned over to her when she reaches legal adulthood - 18.

Lots of rich people do that after watching children of said rich crash and burn from getting inheritances and trust fund access at young ages. They never finished school, never took on any real jobs, and many became substance abusers/suicidal because they literally had nothing to work for.

It’s actually very common for young people receiving a large inheritance to not get the proceeds until they are a little older. Until then it will be managed in trust on her behalf.

This is pretty standard. It’s to ensure the kid doesn’t just just laze around for the rest of their life. Waiting till 25 makes it more likely they’ll finish college and maybe get a job or find something to do with their life other than live off their father’s money.

Because 15-year-olds shouldn’t have 12 million dollars.

Maybe to keep her from turning into Lindsay Lohan? Or maybe there’s a tax reason.

Probably to give her time to prepare to be responsible with it.

Iowa is no more representative of the U.S. than California or New York. Pancake breakfasts? Ethanol subsidies? Rick Santorum? There is no good reason to have the nominating contests go through Iowa first other than tradition. An ideal system would rotate the states that chose first.

Iowa has far more people in actual cities than farms, dickface.

Don’t be a superficial dick. I’m pretty sure the OP’s actual point was that Iowa isn’t a valid representation of a cross section of the US.

And many of them work pretty hard. I guess you have something against people based on where they live and what they do.

And thus the leader of the free world is chosen by a bunch of farmers.

You know, you’re probably right, but it was just so ludicrous I had to respond! 😩

Dude, if you don’t want to see her tits and ass, then don’t follow her on instagram. No one is putting a gun to your head, forcing you to join social media. So nice try, but I’m not buying it. Oh, and if you’re talking about real life, please know this... No woman, no matter how much her tits or ass is hanging out was…

Soooo perhaps having good education about safe sex, easily and cheapily available condoms and birth control, and readily available abortion are the way to go, hm?

Please tell me you’re not one of those people that also think rich folks who want to/can care for children should be the only ones having sex.

yes, I’m sure poor people who have kids sit down and have a reasonable discussion about the long term risks and benefits of having children, carefully considering each factor and ultimately reaching a logical conclusion and making a plan accordingly.

...This comment feel like a slippery slope into eugenics. The old “poor people shouldn’t have kids” argument, which makes me super uncomfortable.

Someday we as a country are going to have to recognize that our incessant worship of money, and well off/rich people has led us down a really fucked up path. Poverty is the root of so many of our societal ills, and people will do ANYTHING to avoid talking about it and it’s effects directly. It doesn’t take a rocket…

Work should be on that list.