And I think we all know what it means when people feel the need to stoop to name calling in an argument.

What isn’t what hate speech is? You keep telling me to try harder while putting no effort into basic things like including a quote for context.

Why would Spencer need to settle if he’s entitled to everything he wants?

Yeah I keep trying but you intentionally make it difficult by refusing to include important context so you can play games instead of having to really engage. You are setting yourself up for an out right now.

Sounds like it should be easy to quote but like I said, you are clearly just trying to avoid having to discuss the claim.

Socialists, gay rights activists, women’s rights activists, anyone you agree with politically, actually. Everyone you agree with is hated by someone. That’s why unless you are directly inciting violence we let everyone have their say.

Because that’s how settlements work, it’s a compromise. Each side give a little so they don’t have to go through the trouble of fighting it out, and in many cases, ending up in a worse spot than before.

This isn’t making sense to you because you don’t know what you are talking about.

Now you are just trying to avoid a real conversation. I’ve responded to many of posts and there are many threads between us. If you actually want me to respond and are not just spewing BS to make yourself feel better, YOU try harder and include a fucking quote for context.

What sentence?

No one believes in absolute freedom of speech and that’s not what I said, I said freedom of speech for things you hate. No one here is arguing that people be allowed to incite violence or yell “fire” in a theater.

Why would he have gotten that? There’s no requirement that Nazis be given whatever venue they choose.

My claim of what exactly? Two word answers with no context doesn’t really do much to make a point. Include a quote or something.

Can you even read? He literally said the opposite of that. Wasting money is not a realistic alternative.

Why do you think having no Nazis giving speeches is worse than having Nazis giving speeches? That’s an interesting take!

The better venue would be the main campus, which is what they would have gotten had they gone to court and won. Settling allowed the school to negotiate a location off the main campus. Not not mention the other aspects I mentioned that you seem to want to ignore. Just like my questions about what possible practical…

Exactly what do you need proof of?

What the fuck is a “protected class of people?” What kind of backwards caste system shit is this?

If you were not ignoring well thought arguments aimed at you, I’d have some sympathy.

Genocide no, apartheid, yes.

You cannot incite violence. You can say you think other people are less than and should be segregated and have less rights.

Because you are literally describing yourself! I’m still waiting for one rational argument why they should have fought a losing battle so they could get a worse outcome.

You are the insane one because you live in a fantasy world where you think a better outcome was possible. It wasn’t.