I like how you left off the part where I continued my sentence to say specifically with regard to it’s ability to reproduce.

And all the times I’ve specifically said that being a living thing doesn’t make you a person.

Your entire argument about me is based on lies.

I don’t think it’s going to matter nearly as much as you do.

It was, indeed, a determination of what is alive and what wasn’t.

It was, indeed, a determination of what is alive and what wasn’t.

And there we have it. “Ending the 2 party system” was to you more important than protecting the poor, disenfranchised, and basic human rights.

Please go to the bottom of the thread where he is now arguing that fetuses are people.

You just said that a fetus is alive in the same way that a born child is alive.

Just FYI:

a) is the scientific definition. That’s all I’m trying to talk about.

Okay you are blatantly misunderstanding this person now. It’s actually ridiculous.

Skip to the bottom of the thread where the guy is now advocating that fetuses are people.

There it is! The fetus is a person argument has surfaced!

You literally said you voted in hope, at least partially, of ending the two party system. Own it.

because the fact that you so proudly claim

You still don’t seem to understand that your candidates shortcomings are not my responsibility.

But I’m the one who is supposedly acting immature.

Did you even read the paper? It gave as an example, a seed as being alive, even though it can’t reproduce until it grow into a plant.

A fetus has just as much capability for reproduction as a born child.

Seriously, this is basic science.

For reals, INSANE.

But expecting the rest of us who are looking at the very real possibility of a repeal of Roe to pat you on the back and applaud your moral purity is pretty damn rich.

then it is a FACT that you voted against yourown best interests

Because you keep using all the hallmarks of the anti-choice movement.