ivybug2
Ivybug!
ivybug2

You took your ball and went home on election day because you didn’t like the rules of the game. You acted like a spoiled child.

What is the problem with being factual and not wanting to waste time that could be spent on logical arguments, on illogical ones?

If you concede that it’s alive,

People who have to live with the shitty consequences of third-party-voters or non-voters bad decisions are mad.

I heard from many Trump voters that they would have voted Sanders.

No, sacrificing the rights of women and people of color because you wanted to make a statement or preserve some facade of moral purity makes you immature. It also makes you an asshole.

Are you trying to say a parasite is not a living thing?

I am shocked at the low level of basic scientific information I am encountering here. Seriously, I did a lesson about living vs nonliving with my preschooler.

No, you’re immature because you acted like a spoiled child.

That has nothing to do with science and being factual.

Nor was that decision a determination of living vs nonliving, it was a determination of legal personhood. Those are two different things.


A national election is not the place to demand ideological purity.

Birth is required to be a living person.

Well I think being a person is different than just being alive. But no, birth is not required to be a living thing. Where are you getting this idea? Again, what criteria are you using to determine life from non life?

Wow, so not agreeing with you means I’m immature?

The opposite of a live is dead, not unborn. Birth is not required to be a living thing.

People get sad about their miscarriage, therefore abortion is murder is the most asinine logic I’ve heard.

Control of the Supreme Court was worth putting up with Hillary’s faults.

I don’t think you will find many people who have dealt with miscarriage or still birth who will agree with you.

I don’t think trying to go the “not alive” route is very effective, as it’s clearly untrue on it’s face. The unborn are alive.

But that certainly doesn’t give them a right to reside in or use another

Those are literally the kinds of reasons people give for voting for Trump. That it’s not about him but about the other things they care about. And then people shit on them fro voting for a terrible person.

But no, liberals were supposed to vote for who they thought was a terrible person because of other political

“ I can’t afford a Audi but that doesn’t mean I can use that as an excuse to steal one.”

Except there is a world of difference between taking a car away from someone so they have less than before you took it, and making a copy of something that doesn’t lave anyone with less than what they started with.

That’s why it’s

Kids or not, one knows from a very young age that theft is wrong

Sure but making copies isn’t the same as theft. Morally speaking there is no real comparison. One leaves a person with less than what they started with (immoral) and the other does not (morally fine).