wow you are cranky

it makes more sense then comparing it to gambling.

and now you are goal post shifting.

its no different then paying to see a movie.

by that rational Gambling and every piece of entertainment are evenly matched.

wrong again. the Kotaku story is arguing that they are on the same level as a comped room.

well yes but the issue here is they are comparing a gambler to someone who isn't a gambler and saying the non gambler doesn't get anything.

can't you get Spectre packs with in game cash?

F2P whale can't go home with a profit because they are not gambling.

yes but in F2P games the whale is always getting something. Its very different from gambling as you are purchasing something always.

the excitment doesn't exist for F2P players? WHAT??

wait you think Vegas whales are ever in danger of taking anything from the house? Come on Vegas whales don't make money. The house Never loses if they did they would be out of business.

"The difference is, a Vegas high roller may actually win something with his money, and at minimum is comped for everything during his stay. In free-to-play games, a whale is nothing but a cash target."

its not that its dead its that the games need to budget it correctly.

except K never read every email she sent, listened to every phone call, and so on.

but can you fly through rings?

yes but Afleck has already played Batman. It was called Daredevil.

exactly and its rare when blockbuster movies get released during the Holiday season.

wow they some how managed to get a panty shot into that picture.

and you get this