Interesting? Yes. Surprising? Sure.
Interesting? Yes. Surprising? Sure.
The health examples are a bit hinky, as those are generally privileges that affect health rather than the privileges of health. I’d think chronic pain and its impacts would top the list (and suspect that it’s the source of the grouchy old man stereotype). Similarly, it’s interesting that physical ability is the item…
It’s important for Gizmodo’s army of armchair activists to have the correct terminology to pepper with expletives while they troll their self-minded comment sections in protest.
I wish I could have shown this trailer to the teenage me, who was gaming during the golden age of Microprose simulators. I’m pretty sure I wouldn’t have survived watching it.
If your “impartial reporting” comes from the Washington Post, you’re even more extremist than your left-leaning audience would expect, Beth.
To summarize, your idealistic and pure idea of criticism is apparently “objective subjectivity”. If every critic’s intent was as noble as yours, and every critic’s methodology as self-reflective, then that might be a more realistic ideal.
The angst is always dialed up near 10 on Jezebel, but I thought peak blame would hit a bit sooner.