itslikeanegg
iTsLiKeAnEgG
itslikeanegg

This will depend on your personal opinion but I find that abortions have a reasonable purpose (rape, issues with the fetus, fatal complications, underage pregnancy, etc) while cheating doesn’t. You may feel differently but thats where I stand on that issue.

On the flipside, by protecting themselves Ashley Madison is also limiting the availability of tools that would allow their users to know if they have been compromised. This is censorship of information for the people who need it most. As a hypothetical Ashley Madison user my question would be “Is my information

It really depends on how you look at it but I would say their actions falls under “asking for it” simply because they put themselves in a vulnerable position that non cheaters didn’t and they also deserved what they were asking for having put themselves into that position. I think the hacking group definitely did

I don’t think you understand how drum brakes work. They aren’t particularly less effective than rotors in terms of stopping power. They just aren’t as good when it comes to cooling but since the front brakes do the heavy lifting anyway and these trucks aren’t being placed on race tracks, the rear brakes don’t really

What a dissapointing write up. There have been numerous articles over the years describing why we don’t get small trucks here so this sounds like Doug just phoned it in. Was this really the best email inquiry you could find? Part of me feels you simply picked it so you can formulate a half witty response to “Stay

More awesome than one could ever imagine.

Yeah, somehow I don’t feel any sympathy. The users did something awful thinking it won’t come back to them. Now it has and they will need to deal with the consequences.

You sound like someone whose mouth reeks of the smell of aged semen.

Ashley Madison failed to secure their network and their customers are at risk. If I was a customer I would want the ability to search the leak to see if my information is out in the wild. Ashley Madison is taking away this ability, a form of information censorship, to protect their business first. Regardless of the

If you’re preventing someone from offering a service or discussion on a specific topic (in this case the Ashley Madison leak), and that topic isn’t covered by copyright or other type of law that prevents this type of discussion then having your legal team issuing bogus DMCA takedown notices is a form of censorship.

That makes a bit more sense as there is source code dumped in the latest leak. They are however sending DMCA notices to web sites that are designed to search the user records only.

It’s being reported on, this is the job of the media. I agree that the hacking group did something illegal and I don’t condone it. I also think that the morally bankrupt users and employees of the site don’t deserve any better. Either way, if a valid law exists to combat the spread of information, it can be used. If

If those are your feelings, then an applicable law should be used as a defense. If that law does not exist, then there is no legal defense.

Because it has nothing to do with the DMCA. Regardless of your feelings about the leak, that is not a justification to apply law in an area it does not belong.

To be fair, not beating someone to death isn’t exactly a tall order so when someone fucks that up, they deserve whatever hate they got.

They did pass a law to limit pumping but it doesn’t take effect until 2020.

LOL! Thanks for the stroking my ego. I can’t remember the last time someone online thought I was so important that they had to reply 10+ days later on more than one occasion. More please!

Honestly, if I didn’t already know about the carrier and its payload, that photo wouldn’t tell me a thing about why its called a destroyer or a harpoon. From that perspective it all looks fairly tame.

Are you asking for clarification because you didn’t thoroughly read the prior statements or because you are a dumb fuck? See how that works. Not an intent to insult right?