I can’t believe his childhood friend or father are unbiased when it comes to their opinions on the “facts of the case”, I imagine they are very much the facts of the case as Jack Montague presents them, where everything points to his innocence.
I can’t believe his childhood friend or father are unbiased when it comes to their opinions on the “facts of the case”, I imagine they are very much the facts of the case as Jack Montague presents them, where everything points to his innocence.
Huh? He got to tell his side at the original hearing. You are not entitled to an appeal in the legal system, why would the university grant him an appeal? Appeal doesn’t mean “I don’t like the decision so give me another chance”, it means “Something didn’t go right procedurally so let’s fix that”. The university was…
But you, “the public”, are on here giving him the benefit of the doubt, and rest assured there are more like you, so dry your eyes.
Hey, look, an MRA troll who again demonstrates his ignorance.
Uh...do you know what the word “appeal” means? They heard his side. They chose not to hear his side again after he’d already presented his side and they’d found that the preponderance of evidence was against him.
You know there’s a link in the article to the procedures that the Committee follows. I went ahead and read them and the process allows the accused to respond in writing, then there’s a fact finding period during which he would presumably be interviewed, then there’s a hearing where both parties have an opportunity to…
Even in the real court system, you aren’t entitled to have a hearing on your appeal. You are of course entitled to file a motion for appeal, but courts are still allowed to deny those motions if they don’t find any basis for it. It would be problematic if he weren’t even allowed to appeal the decision, but unless he…
If your nickname is Gucci and you’re a white guy at Yale, there is 99% chance that you are a tool.
He’s lucky to get away with an expulsion from school. No school expels a star athlete unless the evidence is pretty darn solid. He got to say his peace at the hearing. Unless there’s new evidence in the case that wasn’t presented in the original hearing, they don’t have to let him appeal it.
This is Cleveland, Barry.
They’ll cut him at 3:59, this afternoon.
Well the 49ers could use a good receiver, and we all know that Chip Kelly prefers Whites.
Red Sox players do something similar, except instead of exercise balls, they use Pablo Sandoval.
Fucking clown shoes, bro.
The question really just came out wrong. What he meant to ask was:
Truthers.
hey dude who named himself after an Anchorman character presumably sometime in the last couple years...... if you don’t think you can know exactly how funny something is or isn’t by watching the supposedly completely tonally accurate trailer and knowing what all the jokes are then you can take a damn hike
What’s going on is that somebody is wrong.
“The reasons, she said, Siegel went with L.A. .... the potential for warm weather would select the best runners to compete in steamy Rio de Janeiro.”
“The Things You Don’t See At The Olympic Marathon Trials Are The Most Interesting”
Now to persuade Jim Tomsula to move out of the big suitcase.