If I were to alter this specific example, I’d separate the two out into two distinct questions, so neither is likely to affect the other. I’d also separate them so they aren’t consecutive in the survey.

Hey, no worries. Like I said, they’re minor.

And that’s really simple to answer: no, they did not.

No, that doesn’t explain anything, because cgist is wrong.

You need a source to support your assertion.

When writing about politics, where an actual political veto is in play, using the word “veto” does not have the luxury of ambiguity you’re trying to use to defend poor writing.

Wow.

This is, of course, ridiculous. Prior to the shutdown, Congress had reached a deal that provided $1.7 billion for Trump’s beloved border wall, which he vetoed. Now, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell refuses to sign a new proposal by Democrats.

Plenty of people end up skimming things quickly and think they’ve comprehended the question, when they missed something crucial or their brain subconsciously jumbles the words.

I’m staunchly pro-GMO. But, as a social scientist who frequently performs this same kind of social data collection...

Well good thing he’s unemployed, right? He could even start right now, rather than having to wait a week...

Only tangentially related Meyers, but I hope you’ll cover what’s gone down at MSU the last few days. The interim president was told to resign otherwise he would be fired, forced to resign earlier than he finally requested, and the university has picked a new interim president.

“I like Khaleesi... It’s from Game of Thrones? I suddenly hate it.”

There really is no ambiguity in this. Politicians don’t tweet at all and we all win.

Ok...

U.S. copyright law would disagree with you about dances not being copyrightable.

[Edit: someone already pointed this out]

I wish you would have included Mega Man Zero 2, since that run was a WR.

Is there a joke here I’m not getting?