He did admit it. And Patrick came to his defense. These things both happened. He didn’t deny it, or make excuses. Him, and Patrick both said they frequently exchange ideologies and talking points. Again, they also have the same speech writer.

Are you telling me that you and the people you share ideologies/talking…

“I’m the one that takes things with a huge grain of salt when they seem over-simplified.”

You can also consult work done by other people (who came up with different numbers but the underlying point is that it’s extremely unlikely the plagiarism was coincidence) who at least show something to back up their argument.…

Umm, no. Not the same at all. Biden owned up to it and got punished for it. Biden also wasn’t good buddies with the people who’s stuff he ripped off, and those people he ripped off didn’t come to his defense and give him permission to use it.

It’s not about being gullible, it’s just about using your brain.

Don’t forget the people will hear this guy, and instead of looking into his work that he provides in more detail, they will just say he ignored certain details (again, without even looking at his work) so they can appear smarter than the guy who actually did some work.

Guess which person you are.

So when you posted that video, did you not read the obligatory explanation that goes with it because it contradicts the point you are trying to make?

1) Obama and Patrick have the same speech writer
2) Obama apologized for not citing Patrick and Patrick came to Obama’s defense, encouraged him to stand behind that…

Because you don’t pay attention and you can’t Google, apparently.

“Because I’m the one with post-graduate degrees in the social sciences and have a long history here on Gizmodo speaking on subjects that fall within and close to the realm of social sciences.”

Maybe you should use your post-graduate degree in the social sciences and tremendous reputation here on Gizmodo, to educate…