The fact that you believe the deal he turned down for low-level misdemeanor solicitation was a “sweetheart deal” shows that you know absolutely fucking nothing about the topic you’re bleating on.

Weirdly and almost hilariously short-sighted. I especially liked the part where Internet blogger Diana Moskovitz attempted to tell Bob Kraft’s well-regarded (and well-compensated) criminal lawyers how to argue motions to suppress, something she has never done. But that never stopped a blogger, did it?

No. He wasn’t. If the ball is not advanced past halfcourt, the ball is inbounded in the back court. I can assure you the plan was not to pass the ball 30 feet forward, then call timeout, then inbound from the back court again. 

God, you’re fucking dense.

“We have reached out to the White House for comment and will update if we hear back.”

Correcting you took like 3 minutes.

Nick doesn’t really understand the system or its terminology, so he’s being more confusing than is necessary. But the bigger point is that she half-assed non-prosecuted those crimes and used a grand jury to no-bill them as a total copout. 

LOL.

Not a surprise here. She’s a shitty, petty former prosecutor. The only people those characters don’t go after is cops. 

Man, you’re persuasive. 

Wow, a functional illiterate.

I’m saying your thesis is stupid. I doubt that matters to you. Your inability to think through a point should matter to you, though. 

Beyonce wore a hat with his name on it a few months ago. He’s already fucking famous. It doesn’t get much more famous than that.

Kind of. He’s describing what some schools are doing already, which is offering high school students the opportunity to earn college credit while in high school, thus lowering their burden and hastening their entry into the workforce. It allows individuals to take some of their basic courses for free rather than a…

Yeah, good point. O’Rourke should have certainly campaigned on the message that most Americans are stupid and listless and have no chance. That would have been a great message. Certainly would locked up the angry Internet people demographic. 

The clear implication to anyone who isn’t a sniveling shit looking to mislead is that government would support these initiatives through funding.

He’s indicating to you that most people don’t find Splinter’s petty rants compelling.

“good reporting.”

O’Rourke was discussing an expansion of the existing public loan service program. You literally noted in your article that it is a “scam” because most people aren’t accepted. He’s literally talking about fixing the problem/scam you noted.

Well, no. There’s the small matter of the Constitution and its limiting power on legislation.