ishikawa09
Ishikawa - Section 9
ishikawa09

There are tons of articles written about it all provided by my link using google, which you should have done in the first fucking place instead of being a lazy fuck. You can dismiss what ever you want and remain willfully ignorant about it, but fact remains. They were helped, and got special treatment.

Oh want to compare military experience? Because I am pretty fucking sure I have 12 years inside the military and 56 months total deployed in combat zones that you do not have.
We do not “give it the ole college try”, we train, we prepare and we do battle drills until we can not fuck them up. Then mean, fucking men

The problem is, the standards WILL HAVE to be lowered for females to “successfully” complete SFAS or BUDs, these are programs that WASH OUT men who are physically and mentally prepared and still can’t make it, of no fault of their own, just some people can not do it. We can ignorantly ignore physiology all we want,

Trust me there is NO shortage of sensitivity training in the military.

It’s not if a woman can or can not. It’s does it make the unit better able to do their job, and the answer is a resounding not just no, but FUCK NO.
You all can blog warrior all you want, and bullshit about how you have done this and that, but no woman, was going to drag me, with all my gear, while under duress, any

Q-Course isn’t the hard part, being on the team is. And do we really want to “let her give the ole college try!” when lives are on the line? I sure as fuck don’t and it’s the reason I am glad I am out of the shit show the military has become.
This social experiment will fail, and it will cost men and women their

Yeah lifeguard, military same difference. FFS.

The point I think he is making, SHE CANT PHYSICALLY LIFT HIM UP. I don’t think that was very complicated.

Rangers, SEALs, Delta, SF, MARSOC are all commando units. The community doesn’t utilize the term much, but they are still commandos by definition.
“Commando - a light infantry soldier trained in and capable of conducting raids by amphibious, airborne or land based avenues of approach.”
I suppose the Rangers would be

I think the biggest question that must be asked is “Does Tesla fix this under either A.) Warranty or B.) At realistic cost.”
If either or both of those are yes, then we can move on about our day, because mass production is bound to have a few weak spots in the product. It’s the cost of buying a car built on an assembly

Find me a different American auto manufacturer that doesn’t have similar issues? Hell find me one where a specific model line of cars that doesn’t have a issue with something, that requires major replacements at or around 60k miles.
I’ll be waiting for the “my 1992 Jeep Cherokee Grand Super Sport Wagon Track Racer has

SNES cartridges used to go from 50-110 dollars depending on title. So NO games are not costing more these days. The industry standard for a new AAA title is 59.99 for standard edition I don’t know exactly when that was settled on but it was sometime in the 2000’s.
When I bought Street Fighter II Turbo for SNES it was

Granted it was a LONG TIME AGO, but when I bought Street Fighter II Turbo for SNES when it was first release, it was over 80 dollars, I remember this because it was one of the first games I actually bought myself, with money I had earned.
But I totally agree with you, if a developer is going to take the time and money

I don’t necessarily think its an entitlement issue, its more of lazy developer issue. When games of the same series have historically been or had a single player component, and then all of a sudden switch focus to just multiplayer, its weak sauce.
As an example lets use the recently released Rainbow Six. I spent

Destiny, barren, desolate vanilla, 2 DLC’s and a full expansion later and it still doesn’t really give me anything I want to do beyond a weeks worth of playing new content when ever its released.... and their “new model” has yet to deliver ANYTHING of substance. Sparrow Racing? Really? Something that people have been

I have a couple thoughts I would like to share about this, some concerning EVE and most not.
1.) Absolutely ridiculous. I don’t think anyone who is playing EVE is going to go “need to look at some ships.... ISIS... wait, this promotes islamic jihad? I like EVE, so I must like Jihad!”
2.) Stop fucking calling them ISIS,

Assume, making an ASS out of U and ME

“Eleven years ago, it might have seemed that successful elimination of key targets would lower threat levels and restore some sense of safety to the Western world.”

Actually that worked very well, it was the giant machine that is the US military and lack of fore sight leadership that said “If things are this good

I really don’t care, while MGSV game play wise was outstanding, the story was freaking atrocious, how what we were given was obvious cutup and butchered content, and padding the last 20 missions of the game with 11 missions we had already played just with “Extreme” or “Subsistence” tacked on is just lazy. But the