Simply put, the author is wrong, wrong on that the reason this dam collapsed and wrong about regulations . The company managing it was out of compliance with the regulations. It’s not that regulations were removed but that the company managing them weren’t complying with the regulations as they were. So with that…

Trying to understand what deregulation had to do with this... the author provided no quotes, no context, no “this was required before and now it’s not”. In fact the article that is linked to says they were already out of compliance with the regulations, so what are you trying to say?

Has anybody asked her opinion on this statement she made before, now that she’s a senior advisor to Biden who has be credibly accused with significantly more circumstantial evidence than Kavanaugh?

Not sure you understand what a “Karen” is... it isn’t a drunken idiot. It’s a women who is almost always a upper middle class white suburban soccer mom who thinks “she is right” and demands you bow to her demands no matter what, and that she will demand to see “your manager” and yell argue herself up the chain until…

Not only that, but what others around you are doing. That’s the big one these days, what are points of contact around you? Your friend looked at this item? Well we’ll send ads to you about it too, because you probably talked together about it, so we can reinforce this in your mind. Which my guess is where all the real…

If we can’t evaluate accusations with reasonable scrutiny, the Republicans will use them to destroy any challenge to their goal of dismantling every law and institution that protects the innocent from them.

Because because congress has so many skeletons they are afraid to allow it. It’s pretty odd that the Whitehouse documents are required by law to be released but if you are in the Senate or House... good luck with that we buried the scandals and you really think we’d vote to allow others to see those scandals?

That’s the exact problem, the NYT later admitted they changed words based on complaints from the Biden campaign, and low and behold the Biden campaign is now using that article as proof of innocence. There now is more credible evidence against Biden than there was against Kavanaugh and the silence from media is…

You are both correct and incorrect.

To me it was obvious that they wanted to limit a public “run” on them as much as possible why they tried to get them to front-line people. Even with that we still have a shortage problem, could you image how much of a problem if it went out earlier? Nurses are still having hard times finding them.

That or maybe, just maybe China has made WHO a stooge. Just like the US has done for years with the CIA, etc, the WHO is now China’s stooge. Instead of CIA fuckups affecting regions, this fuckup is affecting the entire world. The fact that China knew about this 6 days before the Chinese new year, and could have done…

This is the first article on Biden’s sexual assault? Seriously? Believe all women... unless they are going against the establishment I guess. You guys are so obviously willing to bend your principals, it’s so blatant that media people like you are protecting Biden from this. News organizations are not supposed to…

If you are still trying to say that 80% of the population getting a tax rate reduction is supply side economics then you are wrong. You’ve not provided anything to say that it is; but fine it’s obvious you think giving 80% of the population a tax rate reduction is supply side. Fine let’s entertain that it is trickle…

Oh... so now it’s not a about what supply side economics (trickle down) really is, but something else and you don’t like that under Trump that the federal government has had hundreds of billions of dollars more. That’s a problem I guess to you... all you’ve got is a definition complaint. You’ve not made an argument…

Again trickle down means the top gets tax cuts not 80% of the population, it’s not favoring the wealthy, it’s a general tax cut. Completely different than the Reagan trickle down giving it only to the top. You can’t be this dense can you?

Reads the article... finds Democrats calling it trickle down, finds nobody from Trump ever saying it’s trickle down only that everybody should be getting benefits.

I remember no statements about trickle down economics from Trump or his advisors supporting this, please provide some sources as I could be wrong.

Well you apparently aren’t well informed either...

The Carbon Brief analysis shows that to prevent catastrophic warming, we need to reduce global emissions by 2,200 megatons of carbon dioxide a year for the next decade to have a good shot of capping warming at 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial levels.

Well... Neil deGrasse Tyson has been pushing it for years before Trump, so maybe it exists because he listened to him?